Trustworthy Smart Cities through Risk Management

From OpenCommons
Revision as of 19:12, December 19, 2021 by Pinfold (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Chapter | blueprint = Cybersecurity and Privacy | sectors = Cybersecurity and Privacy | authors = Lan Jenson, David Balenson, Adnan Baykal, Gary Dennis, Wayne Dennis, Alex H...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Cybersecurity and Privacy
Cybersecurity and Privacy
Sectors Cybersecurity and Privacy
Contact Lan Jenson
Topics
Authors

Lan Jenson.jpegDavid BalensonOC.jpgAdnan BaykalOC.jpgGary Dennis.jpegWayne DennisOC.jpg[[File:|x100px|link=Alex Huppenthal]]Damon KachurOC.jpgBennyLee.jpgCarmen MarshOC.jpgAleta Nye.jpegCarmen ParadaOC.jpgRenil-paramel.jpgBillPugh.jpgMaryam RahmaniOC.jpegCarter SchoenbergOC.jpgSushmitaSenmajumdar.jpgDeborahShands.jpgDean Skidmore.jpegScott Tousley.jpg[[File:|x100px|link=Ed Walker]]Ruwan Welaratna.jpegPaul Wertz.jpegPeterWong.jpeg

{{{summary}}}


Organizations participating in the Smart City environment – whether as municipalities, critical infrastructure operators, product or service providers, or citizens – already consider at least some aspects of risk (e.g., business risk, reputational risk) in the development and deployment of Smart City capabilities and solutions. And one growing area of risk is cybersecurity and privacy risk.

Many of the cybersecurity- and privacy-related vulnerabilities and threats that could affect Smart City environments are similar to those commonly found in the traditional enterprise IT environment. The cyber-physical aspects of Smart Cities as well as the interconnections and interdependencies that are characteristic of Smart City solutions could potentially result in more complex and catastrophic consequences (e.g., disruption of government services to citizens; terrorist event; danger to public health or safety). The recognition of these vulnerabilities, threats, and consequences necessitates the consideration and adoption of risk management processes and practices that can help Smart City organizations make risk-based business decisions, such as identifying what levels of risk are acceptable and where investments need to be made to mitigate risk.

Cybersecurity and privacy risk management does not have to be an undue burden. In fact, there are a variety of tools that can make it easier to integrate risk management; and risk management, in turn, will be an enabler for Smart City solutions and capabilities.

  • There is an abundance of existing guidelines, standards, and references to inform and improve risk management processes
  • Risk management can be a tool and enabler for Smart City solutions by establishing and increasing trust in government and trust in systems *Leveraging existing relationships (e.g., inter-/intra-governmental, public-private partnerships, new and existing suppliers) to collaborate on risk management objectives can increase effectiveness and efficiency in a limited-resource

environment While the need for cybersecurity and privacy risk management is clear, a successful risk management program will require coordination and commitment from all levels of government and from all Smart City participants.

Organizations will need to adopt processes and practices that are appropriate for their specific needs. The NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF) is one tool, of many, that can help organizations supplement and refine existing risk management practices or establish new risk management processes. At the most generic level, the RMF consists of seven iterative steps - an initial preparatory step to ensure readiness to execute the process followed by the six main steps - that can be more strategic or tactical as needed.