Data: Difference between revisions

From OpenCommons
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Sector
{{Chapter
| image          = data200.png
| blueprint = Data
| blueprint      = 20170824-City-Platform-Supercluster-Report-FINAL.pdf
| sectors = Data
| leader          = Scott Tousley, Jason Whittet
| authors = Scott Tousley, Jason Whittet, Wilfred Pinfold
| size            = 200
| poc = Scott Tousley
| description    =
| email = tousleys@gmail.com
This set of {{#ask: [[Category:Activity]] [[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]] |format=count}} projects is managed by the data team and aims to address friction stakeholders experience in the deployment of or operations of IoT CyberPhysical systems. These include business case, privacy guidance, licensing frameworks, and citizen outreach. Additionally, the Data Supercluster is driven by an overarching intent to encourage grassroots, corporate and scholarly proofs of business value and economic sustainability in Smart and Secure Communities and Cities. The Data Supercluster continues to engage with industry leaders, Universities and Colleges, community leaders and solution providers to synthesize a value proposition and means to prove its economic and stakeholder value.  
| document = 20170824-City-Platform-Supercluster-Report-FINAL.pdf
| body            =
| chapter = 300
We're soliciting stakeholder engagement by sharing our research and relevant articles tagged by our team to help those with an Action Cluster proof in progress. Those who care to share their experiences in a Podcast format can contact Alex at aspen dot ai to participate in the Podcast series.
| image = DataChapter.jpg
| summary = In 2016, the United Nations reported that an estimated 54.5% of the world’s population lived in urban settlements. By 2030, urban areas are projected to swell to 60% and one in every three people will live in a city. With more than three million people moving into urban areas each week, cities are faced with an unprecedented challenge.
}}
How do you deliver essential services to your citizens in the face of already stressed aging infrastructure, shrinking budgets and a myriad of challenges that create complexity never envisioned by any civil engineer prior to the 21st century based on this mass influx of people? The pace of change is daunting and cities who do not act to address this seismic migration surge will likely face dire consequences.


The DSC recognizes that regulation can impede and create friction in business and solutions. The DSC reflects the concept that a compass and map is more powerful to innovation and deployment more that step-by-step narrowly defined and approved approaches. We continue to see an acceleration in the technology used for visual processing, vibration analysis and determine the signal that is often hidden in the noise of end point data collectors.  
The smart city concept, based on internet of things (IoT) technologies wirelessly connecting infrastructure using sensors, beacons and other devices that produces substantial amounts of data, was developed to help cities gain better manage their assets. The concept of building a “smart city” can be traced back to various movements and research papers published in the late 20th century. One of the most notable early research pieces from the Los Angeles Community Analysis Bureau, “The State of the City: A Cluster Analysis of Los Angeles (1974)”, “sought new tools to address the old challenges of deteriorating housing by providing detailed local data to identify neighborhoods showing early signs of obsolescence.” Data was identified as one of the keys to gaining a better understanding to an urbanization problem, and that axiom holds true more than ever in 2017.


A major trend that is shaping Data value, is the nature of interconnected Data sources, transfer points, and Cloud computing. The computing now taking place at the Edge of the network is crucial to security and privacy. By distributing the processing costs to powerful edge devices, costs decline and performance of the network is more predictable.  
Modern daily life and the problems associated with it, defined by data, allows deeper insight and decision-making capabilities that both city officials need, and the innovation community requires, to create better solutions to deal with the urban challenges of densification. Quality data is essential, however, making the data accessible and understandable is critical to making the data ultimately valuable.


How do cities deal with the enormous amounts of data that smart cities produce? Once collected, how do city officials interface with this data to extract the right information to make effective operational and strategic decisions? How are these decisions made in a time efficient manner without sacrificing insight, relevance or the ability to synthesize multiple disparate data sources to make a single yet complex decision based on multiple real-time inputs?


High value Data is available via over 2600 sites globally. The DSC vets and distributes lists of directories available for innovators to use in their Action Cluster planning and proof projects. The Data SuperCluster recognizes that Machine Learning and AI applications require high-value datasets, often provided by Cities / Communities as well as Citizens. Flexible open licensing encourage sharing and can help establish a life-cycle of value where derivative works carry a licensing framework that assures access rights to others building on the original data, inference engines, machine templates, and AI applications.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), in support of the smart city space, created the Global City Teams Challenge (GCTC) to help cities create a more unified multi-city, multi-stakeholder conversation to deal with the complex issues associated with operating a city with the daunting urbanization challenges. The role that smart city technology can play across diverse sectors (transportation, energy, manufacturing, healthcare, etc.) can enable cities to improve services, promote economic growth and enhance the quality of life for citizens around the world. GCTC was designed to encourage collaboration among cities and help in the development of standards.


The DSC recognizes that community leaders by virtual of identifying the metrology around Smart Cities drive the evolution that supports that metrology.  
“GCTC’s long-term goal is "to establish and demonstrate replicable, scalable, and sustainable models for incubation and deployment of interoperable, standard-based solutions using advanced technologies such as IoT and CPS, and demonstrate their measurable benefits in communities and cities." “The GCTC program is a collaborative platform for the development of smart cities and communities. It enables local governments, nonprofit organizations, academic institutions, technologists, and private corporations from all over the world to form project teams, or “action clusters,” and “SuperClusters,” to work on groundbreaking Internet of Things (IoT) applications within the smart city and community environment.


By agreeing on what we measure, all cities can then apply the data in a manner that allows each of us to address our unique challenges regardless of the size, governance or location of our municipality. DSC encourages open data exchanges, that build paths between various value add functions in the emerging IoT and Internet interfaces.  
“NIST, along with its partners, acts as a “matchmaker”—facilitating, advising, encouraging, nurturing, and publicizing the action clusters and their projects. Since the program launched in September 2014, GCTC has recruited and incubated over 160 action clusters with participation from over 150 cities and 400 companies/organizations from around the world.


In 2018, the SuperCluster merged with Data governance and exchange SuperCluster to create Data SuperCluster. Data governance and exchange is one of the primary challenges to the deployment of smart cities technologies today. The data governance challenge has two main components. Many cities have successfully implemented data management and open data solutions for public data.
=Global City Teams Challenge Supercluster Workshop on City Platform=
 
On February 7-8, 2017, The City of Kansas City, Missouri, KC Digital Drive and Think Big Partners held the “NIST / KCMO Supercluster Platform Workshop” that attracted over 120 participants from around the world. During this two day event, participants came with a list of problems and questions associated with smart city data and the city platform that was needed to manage it. Additionally, inter and intra-departmental data management issues were also discussed to develop cross-sector understanding of the data platform required to make inter-departmental decisions in a near real-time, macro-city management basis.
There is not yet developed a comprehensive strategy for handling all of the data from thousands of IoT sensors available now and envisioned for the future. Cities are interested in IoT technology as a way to improve operations and the delivery of services. What is a standard, but flexible and customizable framework that will allow cities to use and exchange IoT data for public value while protecting public privacy and trust? GCTC’s Data governance and exchange SuperCluster aims to address the challenge of building a governance and exchange model for IoT data and a plan for governments to successfully customize and deploy it. The group will work to collect best practices and produce blueprints for data exchange and governance, as well as deployed proofs to share with other teams and stakeholders.
The following report was compiled with these objectives in mind:
| chair          =
#Archive the discussions held by participants during the event;
<div><ul>
#Capture the various data elements that were identified as valuable in the management, operations and strategic planning for city officials in the realm of smart city data relative to their major problems;
<li style="display: inline-block;"> [[File:scott tousley.jpg|thumb|none|200px|Scott Tousley, <br />Chief Development Officer <br />Inca Digital<br /> _]] </li>
#Assess some of the city platform functional requirements as identified by the participants based on proposed basic strategies to solve their problems;
<li style="display: inline-block;"> [[File:Jason Whittet.jpg|thumb|none|200px|Jason Whittet, <br />Associate Director, <br /> Solutions Development, <br />100 Resilient Cities]] </li>
#Help define how cities will assess data;
</ul></div>
#Present ideas on how cities will fund, construct and sustain smart city systems over time;
| team            =
#Enhance some of the insights gained during the event with supplemental primary and secondary research; and
<!--[http://kcmo.gov/ Kansas City MO], [https://www.bellevuewa.gov/ City of Bellevue WA], [https://www.100resilientcities.org/ 100 Resilient Cities/Rockefeller Foundation], [http://www.aspenworks.com/ Aspenworks Ltd.], [http://www.kcdigitaldrive.org/ KC Digital Drive], [http://thinkbigpartners.com/ ThinkBig Partners], [https://www.cit.org/ Center for Innovative Technology], [http://cityinnovate.org/ City Innovate Foundation], [http://www.skayl.com/ Skayl], [https://www.cisco.com/ Cisco], [https://www.xaqt.com/ XAQT], [https://www.ucdavis.edu/ University of California-Davis]-->
#Provide additional insights for city data platform and beyond
Kansas City MO, City of Bellevue WA, 100 Resilient Cities/Rockefeller Foundation, Aspenworks, KC Digital Drive, ThinkBig Partners, Center for Innovative Technology, City Innovate Foundation, Skayl, Cisco, XAQT, University of California-Davis
}}

Revision as of 21:52, January 19, 2023


Data
Data
Sectors Data
Contact Scott Tousley
Topics
Authors

Scott Tousley.jpg300px-Jason Whittet.jpgWilfredPinfold.jpg

In 2016, the United Nations reported that an estimated 54.5% of the world’s population lived in urban settlements. By 2030, urban areas are projected to swell to 60% and one in every three people will live in a city. With more than three million people moving into urban areas each week, cities are faced with an unprecedented challenge.

How do you deliver essential services to your citizens in the face of already stressed aging infrastructure, shrinking budgets and a myriad of challenges that create complexity never envisioned by any civil engineer prior to the 21st century based on this mass influx of people? The pace of change is daunting and cities who do not act to address this seismic migration surge will likely face dire consequences.

The smart city concept, based on internet of things (IoT) technologies wirelessly connecting infrastructure using sensors, beacons and other devices that produces substantial amounts of data, was developed to help cities gain better manage their assets. The concept of building a “smart city” can be traced back to various movements and research papers published in the late 20th century. One of the most notable early research pieces from the Los Angeles Community Analysis Bureau, “The State of the City: A Cluster Analysis of Los Angeles (1974)”, “sought new tools to address the old challenges of deteriorating housing by providing detailed local data to identify neighborhoods showing early signs of obsolescence.” Data was identified as one of the keys to gaining a better understanding to an urbanization problem, and that axiom holds true more than ever in 2017.

Modern daily life and the problems associated with it, defined by data, allows deeper insight and decision-making capabilities that both city officials need, and the innovation community requires, to create better solutions to deal with the urban challenges of densification. Quality data is essential, however, making the data accessible and understandable is critical to making the data ultimately valuable.

How do cities deal with the enormous amounts of data that smart cities produce? Once collected, how do city officials interface with this data to extract the right information to make effective operational and strategic decisions? How are these decisions made in a time efficient manner without sacrificing insight, relevance or the ability to synthesize multiple disparate data sources to make a single yet complex decision based on multiple real-time inputs?

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), in support of the smart city space, created the Global City Teams Challenge (GCTC) to help cities create a more unified multi-city, multi-stakeholder conversation to deal with the complex issues associated with operating a city with the daunting urbanization challenges. The role that smart city technology can play across diverse sectors (transportation, energy, manufacturing, healthcare, etc.) can enable cities to improve services, promote economic growth and enhance the quality of life for citizens around the world. GCTC was designed to encourage collaboration among cities and help in the development of standards.

“GCTC’s long-term goal is "to establish and demonstrate replicable, scalable, and sustainable models for incubation and deployment of interoperable, standard-based solutions using advanced technologies such as IoT and CPS, and demonstrate their measurable benefits in communities and cities." “The GCTC program is a collaborative platform for the development of smart cities and communities. It enables local governments, nonprofit organizations, academic institutions, technologists, and private corporations from all over the world to form project teams, or “action clusters,” and “SuperClusters,” to work on groundbreaking Internet of Things (IoT) applications within the smart city and community environment.”

“NIST, along with its partners, acts as a “matchmaker”—facilitating, advising, encouraging, nurturing, and publicizing the action clusters and their projects. Since the program launched in September 2014, GCTC has recruited and incubated over 160 action clusters with participation from over 150 cities and 400 companies/organizations from around the world.”

Global City Teams Challenge Supercluster Workshop on City Platform

On February 7-8, 2017, The City of Kansas City, Missouri, KC Digital Drive and Think Big Partners held the “NIST / KCMO Supercluster Platform Workshop” that attracted over 120 participants from around the world. During this two day event, participants came with a list of problems and questions associated with smart city data and the city platform that was needed to manage it. Additionally, inter and intra-departmental data management issues were also discussed to develop cross-sector understanding of the data platform required to make inter-departmental decisions in a near real-time, macro-city management basis. The following report was compiled with these objectives in mind:

  1. Archive the discussions held by participants during the event;
  2. Capture the various data elements that were identified as valuable in the management, operations and strategic planning for city officials in the realm of smart city data relative to their major problems;
  3. Assess some of the city platform functional requirements as identified by the participants based on proposed basic strategies to solve their problems;
  4. Help define how cities will assess data;
  5. Present ideas on how cities will fund, construct and sustain smart city systems over time;
  6. Enhance some of the insights gained during the event with supplemental primary and secondary research; and
  7. Provide additional insights for city data platform and beyond