Resilience Hubs: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{Chapter |image=ResilientHubChapter.jpg |poc=Stan Curtis |authors=Stan Curtis, Dwayne Johnson, Wilfred Pinfold, Jiri Skopek |blueprint=Buildings |chapter=1030 |sectors=Buildi...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 494: | Line 494: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
=Demonstration Projects= | |||
{{#ask: | |||
[[Category:Activity]] | |||
[[Has tag::Resilience Hubs]] | |||
|?= | |||
|?Has image#=2 | |||
|?Has description#=3 | |||
|format=plainlist | |||
|named args=yes | |||
|introtemplate=Show image Header | |||
|template=Show image | |||
|outrotemplate=Show link Footer | |||
}} | |||
=News= | |||
{{#ask: | |||
[[Category:News]] | |||
[[Has tag::Resilience Hubs]] | |||
|?= | |||
|?Has image#=2 | |||
|?Has summary#=3 | |||
|format=plainlist | |||
|named args=yes | |||
|introtemplate=Show image Header | |||
|template=Show image | |||
|outrotemplate=Show link Footer | |||
}} |
Revision as of 05:46, November 4, 2022
Buildings | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sectors | Buildings Wellbeing | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contact | Stan Curtis | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Topics |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Activities
|
- Authors
This chapter demonstrates how integrated smart systems that draw on a number of technologies, processes, and data can enable a community structures like schools to function more efficiently for their main purpose as well as be prepared to serve as a “Community Resiliency Hub” and/or “Emergency Shelter” as needed. This leverages the existing function of the school as a community hub for families already charged with protecting children, employing vetted professionals, and communicating with parents, public safety, city government.
- While emergency operations are run by highly skilled professionals in post disaster situation they lack outreach and community engagement in pre Disaster Preparedness Planning. Our objective than is to remedy this situation by designing an appropriate equitable system customizable to particular type disaster and socio-economic conditions of a community. Schools offer the best opportunity for community resilience hubs because their location is well known in the community because:
- They are places where do people instinctively turn to, when the disaster strikes, if only to know their kids are safe.
- Are places where citizens come together, volunteer, build skills, access community programs, become physically active and build strong and healthy communities.
- Pretty much everybody in a community knows where the school is.
- In times of disaster, schools also have much of the infrastructure and capabilities to serve as resilience hubs.
- School have a fleet of buses and drivers who are familiar with community routes.
- Schools have showers and toilets and gyms where people can shelter.
- They usually have a kitchen and cafeteria, sometimes an infirmary.
- There are playgrounds where additional temporary enclosures can be erected and there is a Parking for emergency services.
- There is a historical precedent for schools as civil defence centers and even fall out shelters.
- Suggested measures are grouped into the following categories
- Community Disaster Management and Resilience Planning
- Connectivity,
- Communications and Public Safety
- Site,
- Energy/ Grid Connectivity,
- Water,
- Supplies,
- Indoor Environment
- Community Engagement.
- Specific measures are discussed under these respective headings below
- FEMA’s twelve steps are a useful approach i evaluating the Needs and Risks of what…setting up the school as a hub or the Needs and Risks to the community for which the school as a hub is the solution?needs (and risks), and plan accordingly.
Areas of Focus / Steps / Key Questions | Responses to ? / Technology Identification | Key GCTC POC or Group Resource | External Contacts to Tap
(Individuals or Organizations |
A. Risk Evaluation and Community Engagement in the Planning Process (based on FEMA) | Jiri?
|
||
Step 1: Initiation: Scope the Plan& Create a Steering Committee
|
NIST Special Publication 1190:”Community Resilience Planning Guide for Buildings and Infrastructure Systems”, Vol. 1&2 2016
|
|
|
Step 2: Create a vision statement for a how this project can help to enable / strengthen a community to be a Smart, Connected, Safe and Sustainable community
|
|
||
Step 3: What are the key hazards this community has or may face (prioritize by risk level: potential to occur and resulting impact on lives and property) and where are the current assets that will be used to address these threats? Where assets are, and where hazards occur, and evaluate the risks
|
|||
Step 4 : Identify current disaster mitigation action plans and residual risk
|
|
||
Step 5: Identify prioritized disaster response goals, objectives, targets and indicators for each different stakeholder group in the community?
|
|||
Step 6: Conduct a Sustainable Community baseline assessment
|
|
||
Step 7: Identify Safe Community goals, objectives, targets and indicators
|
|
Nowcasting the Next Hour of Rain | |
Step 8: Brainstorm potential Smart, Connected, Safe and Sustainable actions
|
|||
Step 9: Evaluate each proposed action
|
|||
Step 10: Select actions
|
|||
Step 11: Write the Plan
|
|||
Step 12: Evaluate the Planning Process
|
|||
Early Warning System (EWS) for Threats and approaching Disaster
|
FEMA: The National Risk and Capability Assessment (NRCA) https://www.fema.gov/emergency-managers/risk-management/risk-capability-assessment
|
||
B. Connectivity, Communication, and Security / Resilience Network with levels of government, other communities and facilities.
|
Ann, LAN, Debbie | Potential RENS / Public sector connectivity orgs: e.g., Link Oregon (OR), CENIC (CA), PNWGP (WA), et al. | |
|
Cisco Network Emergency Response Vehicle (NERV) https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/solutions/industries/docs/gov/NERV_AAG.pdf
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/about/csr/impact/critical-human-needs/tactical-operations-tacops.html
|
||
C. Energy/Grid Connectivity
A high performance (working) school building is proposed with a high quality building Roof, walls and windows of the schoolWhat does "envelope" mean in this context?envelope as well as high efficiency mechanical and lighting systems. |
Stan? | ||
Specific measures include:
|
Battery storage can be mobile in form of electrical school
PORTLAND (PGE) HERE: is our Portland General Electric (PGE) support for school buses (battery-storage) https://portlandgeneral.com/energy-choices/electric-vehicles-charging/pge-electric-school-bus-fund
SanDiego Gas &Electric (SDGE, Sempra) also has leading microgrid programs including school-solar & bus/fleet charging - Nuvve has a popular Bus-Fleet charging (bi-directional) capability.
http://www.greenschools.net/article.php-id=148.html https://www.kpbs.org/news/2020/sep/15/solar-power-shines-california-schools/
Portland General (PGE) and Connected Communities grant - Neighborhood Power, community grid program - Portland Public Schools (PPS) "Project Zero" education program - PGE Electric School Bus Fund - Beaverton Community Resilience Center ...Public Safety program
|
SAN DIEGO (Nuvve bidirectional charging)
SanDiego Gas &Electric (SDGE, Sempra) also has leading microgrid programs including school-solar & bus/fleet charging - Nuvve has a popular Bus-Fleet charging (bi-directional) capability. https://nuvve.com/nuvve-activates-bidirectional-flow-of-energy-from-electric-school-buses-to-con-edisons-grid/
http://www.greenschools.net/article.php-id=148.html https://www.kpbs.org/news/2020/sep/15/solar-power-shines-california-schools/
| |
D. Water
|
|||
Specific measures include:
|
|||
E. Site
|
|||
A compact development footprint is proposed, Specific measures include:
|
|||
F. Resources and Physical design
|
|||
Specific measures include:
|
|
||
G. Indoor Environment | Phyllis/ Manfred?
|
||
A very high quality indoor environment with high air ventilation rates and IAQ monitoring. Specific measures include:
|
|||
H. Community Engagement and Operations. | Deborah? | ||
|
Virginia Smart Community Testbed
|
||
I. Equity
|
|||
|
|||
J. Funding options | |||
Federal
State Regional Local Community-based |
Federal
|
||
K. Other Considerations | |||