Software Procurement: Difference between revisions
Created page with "{{Chapter |image=Software Procurement.jpg |poc=Wilfred Pinfold |authors=Wilfred Pinfold |blueprint=Data |sectors=Data |summary=In this Chapter, we outline core principles for successful software procurement in municipal governments, emphasizing that mature, well‑defined processes must precede any technology selection }} When processes are sound, enhancing or reconfiguring existing software—rather than wholesale replacement—minimizes risk and disruption Public Sec..." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Public Sector Center of Expertise. Conversely, if processes are weak, cities should first adopt best‑in‑class workflows from peer organizations before procuring new systems. Embracing agile, incremental procurement models fosters closer vendor collaboration, adaptability to evolving requirements, and faster delivery of value. Finally, a clear grasp of software licensing—proprietary, open source, and shared source—and ownership rights empowers cities to negotiate favorable terms, maintain flexibility, and establish lasting partnerships. | Public Sector Center of Expertise. Conversely, if processes are weak, cities should first adopt best‑in‑class workflows from peer organizations before procuring new systems. Embracing agile, incremental procurement models fosters closer vendor collaboration, adaptability to evolving requirements, and faster delivery of value. Finally, a clear grasp of software licensing—proprietary, open source, and shared source—and ownership rights empowers cities to negotiate favorable terms, maintain flexibility, and establish lasting partnerships. | ||
[[ | [[Media:Public-Sector-Procurement-Fit-for-the-Digital-Age.pdf|Public-Sector-Procurement-Fit-for-the-Digital-Age]] | ||
Revision as of 04:03, May 8, 2025
- Authors
In this Chapter, we outline core principles for successful software procurement in municipal governments, emphasizing that mature, well‑defined processes must precede any technology selection
When processes are sound, enhancing or reconfiguring existing software—rather than wholesale replacement—minimizes risk and disruption Public Sector Center of Expertise. Conversely, if processes are weak, cities should first adopt best‑in‑class workflows from peer organizations before procuring new systems. Embracing agile, incremental procurement models fosters closer vendor collaboration, adaptability to evolving requirements, and faster delivery of value. Finally, a clear grasp of software licensing—proprietary, open source, and shared source—and ownership rights empowers cities to negotiate favorable terms, maintain flexibility, and establish lasting partnerships.