Portland Connected Intelligent Transportation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ActionCluster | {{ActionCluster | ||
|image=PortlandSmartTransport.png | |||
|team=Intel, NetCity, Urban.Systems, OpenBike, DKS, Seabourne, Sera Architects, Urbi, UbiWhere, Mobility Cubed, InterInnov, Technical University Madrid | |||
|leader=Skip Newberry | |||
| image | |imagecaption=Above: Portland Skyline, Below: Powell-Division corridor | ||
|municipalities=Portland OR<!--Bureau of Planning and Sustainability, Porto Portugal--> | |||
|status=Implemented | |||
| team | |website=http://urban.systems | ||
| leader | |download=Sensor_network_recommendation_document.pdf | ||
|description=This project focuses on developing a sensor-connected “smart” corridor in Portland where transit data, traffic signalization, and air quality sensing are made available in a data portal with data visualization and analytics to improve transportation options, public health, economic development and civic engagement. | |||
| imagecaption | |challenges=Achieving adequate density, frequency, and precision of environmental sensor measurements to model pollution spatial distributions and the effects of mitigation strategies on pollutant concentrations with a limited budget for sensors. | ||
| municipalities | |solutions=# Calibrate air quality sensors by deploying at one intersection and co-locating with high quality reference instruments | ||
<!--Bureau of Planning and Sustainability, Porto Portugal--> | |||
| status | |||
| website | |||
| download | |||
| description | |||
This project focuses on developing a sensor-connected “smart” corridor in Portland where transit data, traffic signalization, and air quality sensing are made available in a data portal with data visualization and analytics to improve transportation options, public health, economic development and civic engagement. | |||
| challenges | |||
Achieving adequate density, frequency, and precision of environmental sensor measurements to model pollution spatial distributions and the effects of mitigation strategies on pollutant concentrations with a limited budget for sensors. | |||
| solutions | |||
# Calibrate air quality sensors by deploying at one intersection and co-locating with high quality reference instruments | |||
# Evaluate density, frequency, and precision of sensor measurements to secure sufficient data quality to model particulate and gaseous pollutant distributions | # Evaluate density, frequency, and precision of sensor measurements to secure sufficient data quality to model particulate and gaseous pollutant distributions | ||
# Deploy at a sufficient number of junctions to model air pollution on the corridor | # Deploy at a sufficient number of junctions to model air pollution on the corridor | ||
# Deploy across the city | # Deploy across the city | ||
# Share what is learned about sensor performance and quality control procedures developed with other cities to improve deployments of low cost air quality sensors | # Share what is learned about sensor performance and quality control procedures developed with other cities to improve deployments of low cost air quality sensors | ||
| requirements | |requirements=NA | ||
| kpi | |kpi=>5% reduction in the following pollutants CO, NO2, PM2.5 | ||
| measurement | |measurement=# Describe the methods to measure the performance/KPI impact to assess the benefits to the residents/citizens. | ||
# Describe the methods to measure the performance/KPI impact to assess the benefits to the residents/citizens. | |||
# Use electrochemical sensors for gases. Reduce cost to <$250 per sensor. | # Use electrochemical sensors for gases. Reduce cost to <$250 per sensor. | ||
# Test various particle counters ranging from $100- $1000 to understand the level of data quality achievable from various products on the market and how this relates to the level of data needed to achieve our performance targets | # Test various particle counters ranging from $100- $1000 to understand the level of data quality achievable from various products on the market and how this relates to the level of data needed to achieve our performance targets | ||
| standards | |standards=The project will explore the use of FIWARE, a set of tools and libraries with public and open-source specifications and interfaces. FIWARE is contributing to the International Technical Working Group on IoT-Enabled Smart City Framework launched by NIST. FIWARE brings the NGSI standard API which represents a pivot point for Interoperability and Portability of smart city applications and services. | ||
The project will explore the use of FIWARE, a set of tools and libraries with public and open-source specifications and interfaces. FIWARE is contributing to the International Technical Working Group on IoT-Enabled Smart City Framework launched by NIST. FIWARE brings the NGSI standard API which represents a pivot point for Interoperability and Portability of smart city applications and services | |cybersecurity=Portland Mayor's office has been working with sensor providers to define the privacy and security requirements of IOT contracts. Defining data as 'Raw' and 'Delivered' Portland will ensure that all future IOT contracts state what data must be delivered to the city under the terms of the contract 'Delivered' and this data will be owned by the city and where it does not violate privacy concerns will be shared with citizens under the cities open data policies. Further any other data collected in the process of creating the delivered data called 'Raw' data must be destroyed by the vendor and not used for any commercial purpose. | ||
| cybersecurity | |||
Portland Mayor's office has been working with sensor providers to define the privacy and security requirements of IOT contracts. Defining data as 'Raw' and 'Delivered' Portland will ensure that all future IOT contracts state what data must be delivered to the city under the terms of the contract 'Delivered' and this data will be owned by the city and where it does not violate privacy concerns will be shared with citizens under the cities open data policies. Further any other data collected in the process of creating the delivered data called 'Raw' data must be destroyed by the vendor and not used for any commercial purpose. | |||
This project is now exploring ways in which such contracts can be enforced in code at the sensor. | This project is now exploring ways in which such contracts can be enforced in code at the sensor. | ||
| impacts | |impacts=There is a large and growing need for low cost environmental sensors which is emerging technology. The development and evaluation of new low cost sensor packages will support regional economic growth and provide new knowledge about sensor performance so that deployments across any city can ensure the use of sensors and better data quality to improve health and environmental quality. | ||
There is a large and growing need for low cost environmental sensors which is emerging technology. The development and evaluation of new low cost sensor packages will support regional economic growth and provide new knowledge about sensor performance so that deployments across any city can ensure the use of sensors and better data quality to improve health and environmental quality. | |demonstration=* '''Phase I Pilot/Demonstration, June 2016:''' Calibrate air quality sensors by deploying at one intersection and co-locating with high quality reference instruments. | ||
| demonstration | |||
* '''Phase I Pilot/Demonstration, June 2016:''' Calibrate air quality sensors by deploying at one intersection and co-locating with high quality reference instruments. | |||
* '''Phase II Deployment, June 2017:''' Evaluate density, frequency, and precision of sensor measurements to secure sufficient data quality to model particulate and gaseous pollutant distributions. | * '''Phase II Deployment, June 2017:''' Evaluate density, frequency, and precision of sensor measurements to secure sufficient data quality to model particulate and gaseous pollutant distributions. | ||
| supercluster | |supercluster=Transportation | ||
| year | |year=2016, 2017 | ||
|title=Portland: Connected Intelligent Transportation | |||
<!-- | |||
|replicability=The FIWARE NGSI API is one of the pillars of the Open & Agile Smart Cities initiative (oascities.org), a driven-by-implementation initiative that works to address the needs from the cities avoiding vendor lock-in, comparability to benchmark performance, and easy sharing of best practices. There are currently 89 cities from 19 countries in Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific who have officially joined this initiative, including the city of Porto. | |||
}} | }} | ||
[[Category:Year_2016]] | [[Category:Year_2016]] |
Revision as of 09:10, March 19, 2022
{{ActionCluster |image=PortlandSmartTransport.png |team=Intel, NetCity, Urban.Systems, OpenBike, DKS, Seabourne, Sera Architects, Urbi, UbiWhere, Mobility Cubed, InterInnov, Technical University Madrid |leader=Skip Newberry |imagecaption=Above: Portland Skyline, Below: Powell-Division corridor |municipalities=Portland OR |status=Implemented |website=http://urban.systems |download=Sensor_network_recommendation_document.pdf |description=This project focuses on developing a sensor-connected “smart” corridor in Portland where transit data, traffic signalization, and air quality sensing are made available in a data portal with data visualization and analytics to improve transportation options, public health, economic development and civic engagement. |challenges=Achieving adequate density, frequency, and precision of environmental sensor measurements to model pollution spatial distributions and the effects of mitigation strategies on pollutant concentrations with a limited budget for sensors. |solutions=# Calibrate air quality sensors by deploying at one intersection and co-locating with high quality reference instruments
- Evaluate density, frequency, and precision of sensor measurements to secure sufficient data quality to model particulate and gaseous pollutant distributions
- Deploy at a sufficient number of junctions to model air pollution on the corridor
- Deploy across the city
- Share what is learned about sensor performance and quality control procedures developed with other cities to improve deployments of low cost air quality sensors
|requirements=NA |kpi=>5% reduction in the following pollutants CO, NO2, PM2.5 |measurement=# Describe the methods to measure the performance/KPI impact to assess the benefits to the residents/citizens.
- Use electrochemical sensors for gases. Reduce cost to <$250 per sensor.
- Test various particle counters ranging from $100- $1000 to understand the level of data quality achievable from various products on the market and how this relates to the level of data needed to achieve our performance targets
|standards=The project will explore the use of FIWARE, a set of tools and libraries with public and open-source specifications and interfaces. FIWARE is contributing to the International Technical Working Group on IoT-Enabled Smart City Framework launched by NIST. FIWARE brings the NGSI standard API which represents a pivot point for Interoperability and Portability of smart city applications and services. |cybersecurity=Portland Mayor's office has been working with sensor providers to define the privacy and security requirements of IOT contracts. Defining data as 'Raw' and 'Delivered' Portland will ensure that all future IOT contracts state what data must be delivered to the city under the terms of the contract 'Delivered' and this data will be owned by the city and where it does not violate privacy concerns will be shared with citizens under the cities open data policies. Further any other data collected in the process of creating the delivered data called 'Raw' data must be destroyed by the vendor and not used for any commercial purpose. This project is now exploring ways in which such contracts can be enforced in code at the sensor. |impacts=There is a large and growing need for low cost environmental sensors which is emerging technology. The development and evaluation of new low cost sensor packages will support regional economic growth and provide new knowledge about sensor performance so that deployments across any city can ensure the use of sensors and better data quality to improve health and environmental quality. |demonstration=* Phase I Pilot/Demonstration, June 2016: Calibrate air quality sensors by deploying at one intersection and co-locating with high quality reference instruments.
- Phase II Deployment, June 2017: Evaluate density, frequency, and precision of sensor measurements to secure sufficient data quality to model particulate and gaseous pollutant distributions.
|supercluster=Transportation |year=2016, 2017 |title=Portland: Connected Intelligent Transportation