Smart Transit Hubs - B Smart: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (1 revision imported) |
No edit summary |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ActionCluster | {{ActionCluster | ||
|image=Rendering West-Baltimore.jpg | |||
| | |team=City of Baltimore Departments of Transportation, Energy and IT, Baltimore Gas & Electric, Cisco, Verizon, IDC, Universities of Maryland, Old Dominion, Toronto, Greater Baltimore Committee, Baltimore community associations, Maryland Transit Administration | ||
| team | |leader=Jill Sorensen | ||
|imagecaption=Baltimore City EV Ready Transit Hubs | |||
| leader | |municipalities=Baltimore MD | ||
|status=Development | |||
|description=Pilot a smart street light corridor within a system of transit “super-nodes” developed by transforming current major transit stations into transit hubs (Hubs) defined by: | |||
| imagecaption | |||
| municipalities | |||
| status | |||
| description | |||
Pilot a smart street light corridor within a system of transit “super-nodes” developed by transforming current major transit stations into transit hubs (Hubs) defined by: | |||
# connected, city-wide mobile resources; public wifi | # connected, city-wide mobile resources; public wifi | ||
# last mile, multi-modal transport between and to/from Hubs (car share, bike share, ride share, preferably electric vehicles with EV-charging at Hub) | # last mile, multi-modal transport between and to/from Hubs (car share, bike share, ride share, preferably electric vehicles with EV-charging at Hub) | ||
# GPS / GIS / location services | # GPS / GIS / location services | ||
# Bus rapid transit, preferably electric, running non-stop Hub to Hub | # Bus rapid transit, preferably electric, running non-stop Hub to Hub | ||
|challenges=* Transit and mobility resources in Baltimore City is slow and inefficient; coordination between City and State units of government is strained. | |||
|solutions=* The B’Smart Project will identify two transit stations in West Baltimore and a service corridor or “greenway” that can connect the two stations with bus rapid transit (BRT), public wifi, smart street lights for reducing energy and improving lighting and communication options, cycle tracks, safe, well-lit walkways, and citizen mobility improvements through last-mile connections to the stations, including car share, bike share and ride share. Electric vehicles will be encouraged. GPS and GIS technologies will inform movement of people and objects along the greenway. The stations will become “Hubs” for gathering, shopping, recreating, getting around the City, doing business. | |||
| challenges | |requirements=* Develop B’Smart Team. Conduct ongoing = weekly status calls. | ||
* Transit and mobility resources in Baltimore City is slow and inefficient; coordination between City and State units of government is strained. | |||
| solutions | |||
* The B’Smart Project will identify two transit stations in West Baltimore and a service corridor or “greenway” that can connect the two stations with bus rapid transit (BRT), public wifi, smart street lights for reducing energy and improving lighting and communication options, cycle tracks, safe, well-lit walkways, and citizen mobility improvements through last-mile connections to the stations, including car share, bike share and ride share. Electric vehicles will be encouraged. GPS and GIS technologies will inform movement of people and objects along the greenway. The stations will become “Hubs” for gathering, shopping, recreating, getting around the City, doing business. | |||
| requirements | |||
* Develop B’Smart Team. Conduct ongoing = weekly status calls. | |||
* Identify stakeholders (City, State, communities, utility, businesses, consultants and experts, facilitators) | * Identify stakeholders (City, State, communities, utility, businesses, consultants and experts, facilitators) | ||
* Create scope and requirements for West Baltimore B’Smart pilot | * Create scope and requirements for West Baltimore B’Smart pilot | ||
Line 38: | Line 23: | ||
* Design and roll out pilot | * Design and roll out pilot | ||
* Run pilot for six months. Analyze impact. Report. | * Run pilot for six months. Analyze impact. Report. | ||
|kpi=* Improve energy efficiency of greenway lighting by 30% | |||
| kpi | |||
* Improve energy efficiency of greenway lighting by 30% | |||
* Improve crime reporting and response times by 10% for greenway activity | * Improve crime reporting and response times by 10% for greenway activity | ||
* Improve mobility perception, communication and experience along greenway | * Improve mobility perception, communication and experience along greenway | ||
# Use of Connect mobile app | # Use of Connect mobile app | ||
# Participation in CMTA Rate My Ride | # Participation in CMTA Rate My Ride | ||
# transit efficiency, reliability, use | # transit efficiency, reliability, use | ||
|measurement=* kWh savings from LED street lights in pilot | |||
| measurement | |||
* kWh savings from LED street lights in pilot | |||
* GPS of greenway vehicles, activity sensors and monitors | * GPS of greenway vehicles, activity sensors and monitors | ||
* Mobile app analytics | * Mobile app analytics | ||
|standards=* Requires interoperable GPS, crime-reporting, emergency response | |||
| standards | |||
* Requires interoperable GPS, crime-reporting, emergency response | |||
* Establishes standardized procedures for greenway communications management | * Establishes standardized procedures for greenway communications management | ||
# emergency response | # emergency response | ||
Line 65: | Line 39: | ||
* Standardized processes are not unique to city or region and can be replicated and scaled up in multiple cities/communities. The solution is planned to be replicated in 1 city in the US and 1 city in Europe. | * Standardized processes are not unique to city or region and can be replicated and scaled up in multiple cities/communities. The solution is planned to be replicated in 1 city in the US and 1 city in Europe. | ||
* The system will have its own business model to create sustainable revenue stream. | * The system will have its own business model to create sustainable revenue stream. | ||
|cybersecurity=TBD | |||
|impacts=* Energy and cost savings from LED street light installations | |||
| cybersecurity | |||
| impacts | |||
* Energy and cost savings from LED street light installations | |||
* Transit improvement with Hubs and BRT Hub to Hub | * Transit improvement with Hubs and BRT Hub to Hub | ||
* Safety improvement by activity monitoring and response systems | * Safety improvement by activity monitoring and response systems | ||
* Improve health and wellness with safe cycle and walking paths | * Improve health and wellness with safe cycle and walking paths | ||
* Community engagement and access through SSL public wifi to improve perception and reality of crime in greenway and transit hub locations. | * Community engagement and access through SSL public wifi to improve perception and reality of crime in greenway and transit hub locations. | ||
|demonstration=* Phase I Pilot/Demonstration: | |||
| demonstration | |||
* Phase I Pilot/Demonstration: | |||
West Baltimore smart street light pilot survey results reported; collaboration with City, local utility BGE and local partners. | West Baltimore smart street light pilot survey results reported; collaboration with City, local utility BGE and local partners. | ||
* Phase II Deployment: | * Phase II Deployment: | ||
Real-time working application of West Baltimore smart street light pilot in greenway corridor between two pilot West Baltimore transit hubs. | Real-time working application of West Baltimore smart street light pilot in greenway corridor between two pilot West Baltimore transit hubs. | ||
|chapter=Mobility Hubs, Transit-Oriented Development | |||
|supercluster=Transportation | |||
| supercluster | |year=2016, 2017 | ||
| year | |tag=Mobility Hubs | ||
|title=Smart Transit Hubs/ B'Smart | |||
|email=jatsorensen@gmail.com | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 07:03, March 31, 2023
Smart Transit Hubs - B Smart | |
---|---|
Baltimore City EV Ready Transit Hubs | |
Team Organizations | City of Baltimore Departments of Transportation Energy and IT Baltimore Gas & Electric Cisco Verizon IDC Universities of Maryland Old Dominion Toronto Greater Baltimore Committee Baltimore community associations Maryland Transit Administration |
Team Leaders | Jill Sorensen |
Participating Municipalities | Baltimore MD |
Status | Development |
Document | None |
Description
Pilot a smart street light corridor within a system of transit “super-nodes” developed by transforming current major transit stations into transit hubs (Hubs) defined by:
- connected, city-wide mobile resources; public wifi
- last mile, multi-modal transport between and to/from Hubs (car share, bike share, ride share, preferably electric vehicles with EV-charging at Hub)
- GPS / GIS / location services
- Bus rapid transit, preferably electric, running non-stop Hub to Hub
Challenges
- Transit and mobility resources in Baltimore City is slow and inefficient; coordination between City and State units of government is strained.
Solutions
- The B’Smart Project will identify two transit stations in West Baltimore and a service corridor or “greenway” that can connect the two stations with bus rapid transit (BRT), public wifi, smart street lights for reducing energy and improving lighting and communication options, cycle tracks, safe, well-lit walkways, and citizen mobility improvements through last-mile connections to the stations, including car share, bike share and ride share. Electric vehicles will be encouraged. GPS and GIS technologies will inform movement of people and objects along the greenway. The stations will become “Hubs” for gathering, shopping, recreating, getting around the City, doing business.
Major Requirements
- Develop B’Smart Team. Conduct ongoing = weekly status calls.
- Identify stakeholders (City, State, communities, utility, businesses, consultants and experts, facilitators)
- Create scope and requirements for West Baltimore B’Smart pilot
- conduct street light survey of stakeholders
- pilot smart street light specifications
- installation, operations/data management plan
- Develop system architecture
- Create application development team, develop mobile application
- Design and roll out pilot
- Run pilot for six months. Analyze impact. Report.
Performance Targets
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) | Measurement Methods |
---|---|
|
|
Standards, Replicability, Scalability, and Sustainability
- Requires interoperable GPS, crime-reporting, emergency response
- Establishes standardized procedures for greenway communications management
- emergency response
- vehicle movement
- pedestrian activity
- Standardized processes are not unique to city or region and can be replicated and scaled up in multiple cities/communities. The solution is planned to be replicated in 1 city in the US and 1 city in Europe.
- The system will have its own business model to create sustainable revenue stream.
Cybersecurity and Privacy
TBD
Impacts
- Energy and cost savings from LED street light installations
- Transit improvement with Hubs and BRT Hub to Hub
- Safety improvement by activity monitoring and response systems
- Improve health and wellness with safe cycle and walking paths
- Community engagement and access through SSL public wifi to improve perception and reality of crime in greenway and transit hub locations.
Demonstration/Deployment
- Phase I Pilot/Demonstration:
West Baltimore smart street light pilot survey results reported; collaboration with City, local utility BGE and local partners.
- Phase II Deployment:
Real-time working application of West Baltimore smart street light pilot in greenway corridor between two pilot West Baltimore transit hubs.