Trip to Washington DC and Baltimore: Difference between revisions

From OpenCommons
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Best Practice |municipalities=Washington DC, Baltimore MD |Country=United States |Start Date=1991-01-01 |End Date=1991-01-01 |Image=TriptoDC.jpg |Description=Best Practices trip in 1991 to Washington, D.C. and Baltimore MD }} ==Event Notes, PostTrip Comments==")
 
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
}}
}}
==Event Notes, PostTrip Comments==
==Event Notes, PostTrip Comments==
===Washington, D.C.===
*The purpose of the Portland delegation’s trip to Washington, D.C. was mostly to visit the Oregon/Portland delegation to Congress;
*The delegation also visited the U.S. Dept. of Transportation;
*The delegation also visited the U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development about local priorities.
===Baltimore===
#The Baltimore itinerary stressed urban revitalization The group visited:
o
Cam
den Yards (baseball
and football teams);
o
Harbor P
lace and Inner Harbor (along water with mixed use)
Both projects were successful but did very little to the rest of the city
They stressed importance of revitalization of old buildings, not necessarily ne
w
construction
Compared to Portland, Baltimore has far mo
re serious issues regarding poverty,
poor education, lack of talent and good jobs
Lesson for Port
l
and
:
Prevent
an
economic slide
and urban deterioration
before
it gets too
serious (same
lesson
for Portland
as
the BP delegation saw in
Detroit)

Revision as of 19:48, March 17, 2024

TriptoDC.jpg

Municipalities Washington DCBaltimore MD

United States

From: 01 Jan 1991 - To - 01 Jan 1991

Description: Best Practices trip in 1991 to Washington, D.C. and Baltimore MD

Event Notes, PostTrip Comments

Washington, D.C.

  • The purpose of the Portland delegation’s trip to Washington, D.C. was mostly to visit the Oregon/Portland delegation to Congress;
  • The delegation also visited the U.S. Dept. of Transportation;
  • The delegation also visited the U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development about local priorities.

Baltimore

  1. The Baltimore itinerary stressed urban revitalization The group visited:

o Cam den Yards (baseball and football teams); o Harbor P lace and Inner Harbor (along water with mixed use) Both projects were successful but did very little to the rest of the city They stressed importance of revitalization of old buildings, not necessarily ne w construction Compared to Portland, Baltimore has far mo re serious issues regarding poverty, poor education, lack of talent and good jobs Lesson for Port l and

Prevent an economic slide – and urban deterioration – before it gets too serious (same lesson for Portland as the BP delegation saw in Detroit)