Open Source - Revision history

Pinfold at 00:05, July 30, 2023

2023-07-30T00:05:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:05, July 30, 2023
Line 376:		Line 376:
	{{#scite:OL28341888M		{{#scite:OL28341888M
	\|title=Working in Public		\|title=Working in Public
			\|type=book
	\|subtitle=The Making and Maintenance of Open Source Software		\|subtitle=The Making and Maintenance of Open Source Software
	\|author=Nadia Eghbal		\|author=Nadia Eghbal

Pinfold at 00:02, July 30, 2023

2023-07-30T00:02:17Z

@@ Line 372: / Line 372: @@
   |file = https://opencommons.org/images/0/0e/OpenPDS.pdf
   |github = https://github.com/HumanDynamics/openPDS
 }}

Pinfold at 23:22, July 29, 2023

2023-07-29T23:22:18Z

@@ Line 341: / Line 341: @@
   |retrieved-on=2023-07-29
   |url=https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10176179
 }}

Pinfold at 18:43, July 29, 2023

2023-07-29T18:43:29Z

@@ Line 247: / Line 247: @@
   |retrieved-on=2023-07-29
   |url=https://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol51/iss1/13/
 }}

Pinfold at 18:34, July 29, 2023

2023-07-29T18:34:54Z

@@ Line 177: / Line 177: @@
   |retrieved-on=2023-07-29
   |url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-75251-4_2
 }}

Pinfold at 18:28, July 29, 2023

2023-07-29T18:28:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:28, July 29, 2023
Line 46:		Line 46:
	==Barriers to Use==		==Barriers to Use==
	Two barriers currently exist to effective and powerful smart city solutions. First, many current smart city ICT deployments are based on custom systems that are not interoperable, portable across cities, extensible, or cost-effective. Second, a number of architectural design efforts are currently underway (e.g. ISO/IEC JTC1, IEC, IEEE, ITU and consortia) but have not yet converged, creating uncertainty among stakeholders. To reduce these barriers, NIST and its partners convened an international public working group to compare and distill from these architectural efforts and city stakeholders a consensus framework of common architectural features to enable smart city solutions that meet the needs of modern communities.		Two barriers currently exist to effective and powerful smart city solutions. First, many current smart city ICT deployments are based on custom systems that are not interoperable, portable across cities, extensible, or cost-effective. Second, a number of architectural design efforts are currently underway (e.g. ISO/IEC JTC1, IEC, IEEE, ITU and consortia) but have not yet converged, creating uncertainty among stakeholders. To reduce these barriers, NIST and its partners convened an international public working group to compare and distill from these architectural efforts and city stakeholders a consensus framework of common architectural features to enable smart city solutions that meet the needs of modern communities.

			<!-- Citations -->

			{{#scite:
			\|reference=linåker2023op
			\|type=journal-article
			\|title=Open Source Software in the Public Sector: 25 Years and Still in Its Infancy
			\|author=Johan Linåker;Gregorio Robles;Deborah Bryant;Sachiko Muto\|+sep=;
			\|journal=IEEE Software
			\|publisher=Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
			\|year=2023
			\|volume=40
			\|issue=4
			\|pages=39-44
			\|doi=10.1109/ms.2023.3266105
			\|subject=Software
			\|issn=0740-7459;1937-4194\|+sep=;
			\|retrieved-from=https://dx.doi.org/
			\|retrieved-on=2023-07-29
			}}

			{{#scite:
			\|reference=robles2019tw
			\|type=journal-article
			\|title=Twenty Years of Open Source Software: From Skepticism to Mainstream
			\|author=Gregorio Robles;Igor Steinmacher;Paul Adams;Christoph Treude\|+sep=;
			\|journal=IEEE Software
			\|publisher=Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
			\|year=2019
			\|volume=36
			\|issue=6
			\|pages=12-15
			\|doi=10.1109/ms.2019.2933672
			\|subject=Software
			\|issn=0740-7459;1937-4194\|+sep=;
			\|retrieved-from=https://dx.doi.org/
			\|retrieved-on=2023-07-29
			}}

			{{#scite:
			\|reference=Blind2023
			\|type=report
			\|author=K. Blind et al.
			\|title=The impact of open source software and hardware on technological independence, competitiveness and innovation in the EU economy
			\|publisher=European Commission,
			\|location=Brussels Belgium
			\|year=2021
			\|retrieved-on=2023-07-29
			\|file=https://opencommons.org/images/c/c1/The_impact_of_open_source_software_and_hardware_on-KK0421081ENN.pdf
			}}

			{{#scite:
			\|reference=Nagle2019
			\|type=report
			\|author=Frank Nagle
			\|title=Government technology policy, social value, and national competitiveness
			\|publisher=Harvard Business School Strategy Unit
			\|location=Boston MA
			\|issue=19–103
			\|year=2019
			\|retrieved-on=2023-07-29
			\|file=https://opencommons.org/images/8/87/19-103_70f212c8-c4fe-4989-ac99-e03cf8bbf02d.pdf
			}}

			{{#scite:
			\|reference=linaker2020wh
			\|type=journal-article
			\|title=What to share, when, and where: balancing the objectives and complexities of open source software contributions
			\|author=Johan Linåker;Björn Regnell\|+sep=;
			\|journal=Empirical Software Engineering
			\|publisher=Springer Science and Business Media LLC
			\|year=2020
			\|volume=25
			\|issue=5
			\|pages=3799-3840
			\|doi=10.1007/s10664-020-09855-2
			\|subject=Software
			\|issn=1382-3256;1573-7616\|+sep=;
			\|retrieved-from=https://dx.doi.org/
			\|retrieved-on=2023-07-29
			}}

			{{#scite:
			\|reference=publiques2022
			\|type=report
			\|title=Strasbourg declaration on the common values and challenges of European public administrations
			\|publisher=Ministère de la Transformation et de la Fonction Publiques
			\|location=Strasbourg France
			\|year=2022
			\|retrieved-on=2023-07-29
			\|file=https://opencommons.org/images/9/9a/Declaration_common_values_challenges_european_public_administrations_1.pdf
			}}

			{{#scite:
			\|reference=thinkopen2020
			\|type=report
			\|title=Open source software strategy 2021-2023, think open
			\|publisher=European Commission
			\|location=Brussels Belgium
			\|number=7149
			\|year=2020
			\|retrieved-on=2023-07-29
			\|file=https://opencommons.org/images/9/9d/En_ec_open_source_strategy_2020-2023.pdf
			}}

			{{#scite:
			\|reference=thinkopen2020
			\|type=report
			\|title=Open-source technologies for sustainable development
			\|publisher=United Nations Economic and Social Council
			\|location=New York NY
			\|resolution E/RES/2021/30
			\|year=2021
			\|retrieved-on=2023-07-29
			\|file=https://opencommons.org/images/8/83/Ecosoc_res_2021d30_en.pdf
			}}

			{{#scite:
			\|reference=lundell2021en
			\|type=book-chapter
			\|title=Enabling OSS Usage Through Procurement Projects: How Can Lock-in Effects Be Avoided?
			\|author=Björn Lundell;Jonas Gamalielsson;Simon Butler;Christoffer Brax;Tomas Persson;Anders Mattsson;Tomas Gustavsson;Jonas Feist;Jonas Öberg\|+sep=;
			\|journal=IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology
			\|publisher=Springer International Publishing
			\|year=2021
			\|pages=16-27
			\|doi=10.1007/978-3-030-75251-4_2
			\|issn=1868-4238;1868-422X\|+sep=;
			\|retrieved-from=https://dx.doi.org/
			\|retrieved-on=2023-07-29
			\|url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-75251-4_2
			}}

Pinfold at 06:13, January 17, 2023

2023-01-17T06:13:11Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Chapter
-| blueprint = Data
+|image=OpenSource.jpg
-| sectors = Data
+|poc=Wilfred Pinfold
-| authors = Wilfred Pinfold
+|authors=Wilfred Pinfold
-| poc = Wilfred Pinfold
+|blueprint=Data
-| email = wilfred.pinfold@urban.systems
+|chapter=3800
-| document = 20170824-City-Platform-Supercluster-Report-FINAL.pdf
+|sectors=Data
-| chapter = 3800
+|summary=Open source refers to a type of software or technology whose source code is publicly available and can be modified and distributed by anyone. This means that the underlying code that makes the software or technology work is freely accessible to the public, and can be modified, improved, or distributed by anyone without the need for permission from the original creator.
-| image = OpenSource.jpg
+|email=wilfred.pinfold@urban.systems
-| summary = Two barriers currently exist to effective and powerful smart city solutions. First, many current smart city ICT deployments are based on custom systems that are not interoperable, portable across cities, extensible, or cost-effective. Second, a number of architectural design efforts are currently underway (e.g. ISO/IEC JTC1, IEC, IEEE, ITU and consortia) but have not yet converged, creating uncertainty among stakeholders. To reduce these barriers, NIST and its partners convened an international public working group to compare and distill from these architectural efforts and city stakeholders a consensus framework of common architectural features to enable smart city solutions that meet the needs of modern communities.
+|document=20170824-City-Platform-Supercluster-Report-FINAL.pdf
 }}

Pinfold at 22:28, January 15, 2023

2023-01-15T22:28:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:28, January 15, 2023
Line 9:		Line 9:
	\| image = OpenSource.jpg		\| image = OpenSource.jpg
	\| summary = Two barriers currently exist to effective and powerful smart city solutions. First, many current smart city ICT deployments are based on custom systems that are not interoperable, portable across cities, extensible, or cost-effective. Second, a number of architectural design efforts are currently underway (e.g. ISO/IEC JTC1, IEC, IEEE, ITU and consortia) but have not yet converged, creating uncertainty among stakeholders. To reduce these barriers, NIST and its partners convened an international public working group to compare and distill from these architectural efforts and city stakeholders a consensus framework of common architectural features to enable smart city solutions that meet the needs of modern communities.		\| summary = Two barriers currently exist to effective and powerful smart city solutions. First, many current smart city ICT deployments are based on custom systems that are not interoperable, portable across cities, extensible, or cost-effective. Second, a number of architectural design efforts are currently underway (e.g. ISO/IEC JTC1, IEC, IEEE, ITU and consortia) but have not yet converged, creating uncertainty among stakeholders. To reduce these barriers, NIST and its partners convened an international public working group to compare and distill from these architectural efforts and city stakeholders a consensus framework of common architectural features to enable smart city solutions that meet the needs of modern communities.
	}}		}}
	~~__NOTOC__~~

Pinfold at 22:27, January 15, 2023

2023-01-15T22:27:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:27, January 15, 2023
Line 11:		Line 11:
	}}		}}
	__NOTOC__		__NOTOC__
	~~=Demonstration Projects=~~
	~~{{#ask:~~
	~~[[Category:Activity]]~~
	~~[[Has tag::Open Source]]~~
	~~\|?=~~
	~~\|?Has image#=2~~
	~~\|?Has description#=3~~
	~~\|format=plainlist~~
	~~\|named args=yes~~
	~~\|introtemplate=Show image Header~~
	~~\|template=Show image~~
	~~\|outrotemplate=Show link Footer~~
	}}
	~~=News=~~
	~~{{#ask:~~
	~~[[Category:News]]~~
	~~[[Has tag::Open Source]]~~
	~~\|?=~~
	~~\|?Has image#=2~~
	~~\|?Has summary#=3~~
	~~\|format=plainlist~~
	~~\|named args=yes~~
	~~\|introtemplate=Show image Header~~
	~~\|template=Show image~~
	~~\|outrotemplate=Show link Footer~~
	}}

Pinfold at 16:39, March 16, 2022

2022-03-16T16:39:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:39, March 16, 2022
Line 7:		Line 7:
	\| document = 20170824-City-Platform-Supercluster-Report-FINAL.pdf		\| document = 20170824-City-Platform-Supercluster-Report-FINAL.pdf
	\| chapter = 3800		\| chapter = 3800
	\| image =		\| image = OpenSource.jpg
	\| summary = Two barriers currently exist to effective and powerful smart city solutions. First, many current smart city ICT deployments are based on custom systems that are not interoperable, portable across cities, extensible, or cost-effective. Second, a number of architectural design efforts are currently underway (e.g. ISO/IEC JTC1, IEC, IEEE, ITU and consortia) but have not yet converged, creating uncertainty among stakeholders. To reduce these barriers, NIST and its partners convened an international public working group to compare and distill from these architectural efforts and city stakeholders a consensus framework of common architectural features to enable smart city solutions that meet the needs of modern communities.		\| summary = Two barriers currently exist to effective and powerful smart city solutions. First, many current smart city ICT deployments are based on custom systems that are not interoperable, portable across cities, extensible, or cost-effective. Second, a number of architectural design efforts are currently underway (e.g. ISO/IEC JTC1, IEC, IEEE, ITU and consortia) but have not yet converged, creating uncertainty among stakeholders. To reduce these barriers, NIST and its partners convened an international public working group to compare and distill from these architectural efforts and city stakeholders a consensus framework of common architectural features to enable smart city solutions that meet the needs of modern communities.
	}}		}}