Measuring Transportation Performance - Revision history

Pinfold at 06:49, April 1, 2023

2023-04-01T06:49:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:49, April 1, 2023
Line 90:		Line 90:
	\|header=Notes		\|header=Notes
	\|listtype=ul		\|listtype=ul
	\|references=hara2016ne;secinaro2022sm;chaos2018~~;2018lo~~;TOD 2012\|+sep=;		\|references=hara2016ne;secinaro2022sm;chaos2018;TOD 2012\|+sep=;
	}}		}}
	{{#referencelist:}}		{{#referencelist:}}

Pinfold at 06:28, April 1, 2023

2023-04-01T06:28:50Z

@@ Line 90: / Line 90: @@
   |header=Notes
   |listtype=ul
-  |references=Economist 2017;Chu 2018;chaos2018;Félix 2020;Morris 2019|+sep=;
+  |references=hara2016ne;secinaro2022sm;chaos2018;2018lo;TOD 2012|+sep=;
 }}
 {{#referencelist:}}

Pinfold at 06:24, April 1, 2023

2023-04-01T06:24:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:24, April 1, 2023
Line 93:		Line 93:
	}}		}}
	{{#referencelist:}}		{{#referencelist:}}
	{{#scite:		{{#scite:hara2016ne
	~~\|reference=~~hara2016ne
	\|type=journal-article		\|type=journal-article
	\|title=New Key Performance Indicators for a Smart Sustainable City		\|title=New Key Performance Indicators for a Smart Sustainable City
Line 111:		Line 110:
	\|retrieved-on=2023-03-31		\|retrieved-on=2023-03-31
	\|@show=true		\|@show=true
	}}{{#scite:		}}{{#scite:secinaro2022sm
	~~\|reference=~~secinaro2022sm
	\|type=journal-article		\|type=journal-article
	\|title=Smart city reporting: A bibliometric and structured literature review analysis to identify technological opportunities and challenges for sustainable development		\|title=Smart city reporting: A bibliometric and structured literature review analysis to identify technological opportunities and challenges for sustainable development
Line 127:		Line 125:
	\|retrieved-on=2023-03-31		\|retrieved-on=2023-03-31
	\|@show=true		\|@show=true
	}}{{#scite:		}}{{#scite:de sanctis2021mi
	~~\|reference=~~de sanctis2021mi
	\|type=journal-article		\|type=journal-article
	\|title=MIKADO: a smart city KPIs assessment modeling framework		\|title=MIKADO: a smart city KPIs assessment modeling framework
Line 146:		Line 143:
	\|@show=true		\|@show=true
	}}		}}
	{{#scite:		{{#scite:albacete2017re
	~~\|reference=~~albacete2017re
	\|type=journal-article		\|type=journal-article
	\|title=Resident group specific accessibility analysis and implications for the Great Helsinki Region using Structural Accessibility Layer		\|title=Resident group specific accessibility analysis and implications for the Great Helsinki Region using Structural Accessibility Layer
Line 165:		Line 161:
	\|@show=true		\|@show=true
	}}		}}
	{{#scite:		{{#scite:2018lo
	~~\|reference=~~2018lo
	\|type=report-series		\|type=report-series
	\|title=London's Accessibility Indicators		\|title=London's Accessibility Indicators

Pinfold at 06:21, April 1, 2023

2023-04-01T06:21:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:21, April 1, 2023
Line 111:		Line 111:
	\|retrieved-on=2023-03-31		\|retrieved-on=2023-03-31
	\|@show=true		\|@show=true
	}}		}}{{#scite:
	{{#scite:
	\|reference=secinaro2022sm		\|reference=secinaro2022sm
	\|type=journal-article		\|type=journal-article
Line 128:		Line 127:
	\|retrieved-on=2023-03-31		\|retrieved-on=2023-03-31
	\|@show=true		\|@show=true
	}}		}}{{#scite:
	{{#scite:
	\|reference=de sanctis2021mi		\|reference=de sanctis2021mi
	\|type=journal-article		\|type=journal-article

Pinfold at 06:19, April 1, 2023

2023-04-01T06:19:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:19, April 1, 2023
Line 93:		Line 93:
	}}		}}
	{{#referencelist:}}		{{#referencelist:}}
			{{#scite:
			\|reference=hara2016ne
			\|type=journal-article
			\|title=New Key Performance Indicators for a Smart Sustainable City
			\|author=Minako Hara;Tomomi Nagao;Shinsuke Hannoe;Jiro Nakamura\|+sep=;
			\|journal=Sustainability
			\|publisher=MDPI AG
			\|year=2016
			\|volume=8
			\|issue=3
			\|pages=206
			\|doi=10.3390/su8030206
			\|file=https://opencommons.org/images/6/60/New_Key_Performance_Indicators_for_a_Smart_Sustain.pdf
			\|subject=Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law;Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment;Geography, Planning and Development\|+sep=;
			\|issn=2071-1050
			\|retrieved-from=https://dx.doi.org/
			\|retrieved-on=2023-03-31
			\|@show=true
			}}
			{{#scite:
			\|reference=secinaro2022sm
			\|type=journal-article
			\|title=Smart city reporting: A bibliometric and structured literature review analysis to identify technological opportunities and challenges for sustainable development
			\|author=Silvana Secinaro;Valerio Brescia;Federico Lanzalonga;Gabriele Santoro\|+sep=;
			\|journal=Journal of Business Research
			\|publisher=Elsevier BV
			\|year=2022
			\|volume=149
			\|pages=296-313
			\|doi=10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.032
			\|subject=Marketing
			\|issn=0148-2963
			\|retrieved-from=https://dx.doi.org/
			\|retrieved-on=2023-03-31
			\|@show=true
			}}
			{{#scite:
			\|reference=de sanctis2021mi
			\|type=journal-article
			\|title=MIKADO: a smart city KPIs assessment modeling framework
			\|author=Martina De Sanctis;Ludovico Iovino;Maria Teresa Rossi;Manuel Wimmer\|+sep=;
			\|journal=Software and Systems Modeling
			\|publisher=Springer Science and Business Media LLC
			\|year=2021
			\|volume=21
			\|issue=1
			\|pages=281-309
			\|doi=10.1007/s10270-021-00907-9
			\|file=https://opencommons.org/images/b/b6/MIKADO_a_smart_city_KPIs_assessment_modeling_frame.pdf
			\|subject=Modeling and Simulation;Software\|+sep=;
			\|issn=1619-1366;1619-1374\|+sep=;
			\|retrieved-from=https://dx.doi.org/
			\|retrieved-on=2023-03-31
			\|@show=true
			}}
			{{#scite:
			\|reference=albacete2017re
			\|type=journal-article
			\|title=Resident group specific accessibility analysis and implications for the Great Helsinki Region using Structural Accessibility Layer
			\|author=X. Albacete;T. Toivonen;M. Salonen;P. Saarsalmi;M. Kolehmainen\|+sep=;
			\|journal=Case Studies on Transport Policy
			\|publisher=Elsevier BV
			\|year=2017
			\|volume=5
			\|issue=1
			\|pages=87-101
			\|doi=10.1016/j.cstp.2016.12.001
			\|file=https://opencommons.org/images/0/0f/Albaceteetal.2017CSTP.pdf
			\|subject=Urban Studies;Transportation;Geography, Planning and Development\|+sep=;
			\|issn=2213-624X
			\|retrieved-from=https://dx.doi.org/
			\|retrieved-on=2023-03-31
			\|@show=true
			}}
			{{#scite:
			\|reference=2018lo
			\|type=report-series
			\|title=London's Accessibility Indicators
			\|journal=International Transport Forum Discussion Papers
			\|publisher=Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD)
			\|year=2018
			\|doi=10.1787/cb74d5d5-en
			\|issn=2223-439X
			\|file=https://opencommons.org/images/a/a5/London-accessibility-indicators.pdf
			\|retrieved-from=https://dx.doi.org/
			\|retrieved-on=2023-03-31
			\|@show=true
			}}
			{{#scite:TOD 2012
			\|date = 2012
			\|last = Charalabidis\| first = Yannis\| author = Dittmar, H, et.al.
			\|type= book
			\|title = The new transit town: Best practices in transit-oriented development
			\|publisher = Island Press
			\|isbn = 1-55963-117-1
			}}

Pinfold at 06:15, April 1, 2023

2023-04-01T06:15:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:15, April 1, 2023
Line 92:		Line 92:
	\|references=Economist 2017;Chu 2018;chaos2018;Félix 2020;Morris 2019\|+sep=;		\|references=Economist 2017;Chu 2018;chaos2018;Félix 2020;Morris 2019\|+sep=;
	}}		}}
			{{#referencelist:}}

Pinfold at 06:13, April 1, 2023

2023-04-01T06:13:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:13, April 1, 2023
Line 86:		Line 86:

	It is essential for readers to consider using HKPIs for accessibility of services and resources in their own work to promote social equity and inclusion in their communities. By taking a more comprehensive and inclusive approach to transportation planning and decision-making, we can ensure that all members of the community have equal access to essential services and resources, regardless of their income, ability, or geographic location.		It is essential for readers to consider using HKPIs for accessibility of services and resources in their own work to promote social equity and inclusion in their communities. By taking a more comprehensive and inclusive approach to transportation planning and decision-making, we can ensure that all members of the community have equal access to essential services and resources, regardless of their income, ability, or geographic location.

			{{#referencelist:
			\|header=Notes
			\|listtype=ul
			\|references=Economist 2017;Chu 2018;chaos2018;Félix 2020;Morris 2019\|+sep=;
			}}

Pinfold at 05:38, March 31, 2023

2023-03-31T05:38:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:38, March 31, 2023
Line 18:		Line 18:
	==Limitations of conventional transportation HKPIs==		==Limitations of conventional transportation HKPIs==
	[[File:Transit-Oriented Neighborhood in St. Louis.jpg\|500px\|thumb\|Transit-Oriented Neighborhood in St. Louis]]		[[File:Transit-Oriented Neighborhood in St. Louis.jpg\|500px\|thumb\|Transit-Oriented Neighborhood in St. Louis]]

	Conventional transportation[[CiteRef::Mishra 2012]] HKPIs are designed to measure the efficiency and performance of the transportation system, often focusing on factors such as travel time, traffic flow, vehicle capacity, and infrastructure utilization. However, they overlook the importance of accessibility of services and resources. This can lead to disparities in access to essential services and resources, such as healthcare, education, employment, and social services. Conventional HKPIs may not account for differences in accessibility between different population groups or consider the specific needs of vulnerable populations. By focusing solely on transportation efficiency, conventional HKPIs may perpetuate social inequities and discrimination, failing to promote social equity and inclusion.		Conventional transportation[[CiteRef::Mishra 2012]] HKPIs are designed to measure the efficiency and performance of the transportation system, often focusing on factors such as travel time, traffic flow, vehicle capacity, and infrastructure utilization. However, they overlook the importance of accessibility of services and resources. This can lead to disparities in access to essential services and resources, such as healthcare, education, employment, and social services. Conventional HKPIs may not account for differences in accessibility between different population groups or consider the specific needs of vulnerable populations. By focusing solely on transportation efficiency, conventional HKPIs may perpetuate social inequities and discrimination, failing to promote social equity and inclusion.

Line 58:		Line 57:

	==Case studies of cities using HKPIs for accessibility of services and resources==		==Case studies of cities using HKPIs for accessibility of services and resources==
			[[File:Accessibility-classes-in-the-Helsinki-Capital-Region-considering-all-services-and-using_W640.jpg\|500px\|thumb\|Accessibility Map Helsinki]]
	One example of a city that has implemented HKPIs for accessibility of services and resources is [[Helsinki Finland]]. The city has developed an accessibility map[[CiteRef::albacete2017re]] that provides information on the accessibility of public spaces, transportation, and services for people with disabilities. The map is based on user-generated data and includes information on the availability of accessible parking, public restrooms, and accessible public transportation. The city also uses HKPIs to evaluate the accessibility of its public transportation system, such as measuring the percentage of public transportation stops that are accessible to people with disabilities and the percentage of vehicles that are equipped with wheelchair ramps.		One example of a city that has implemented HKPIs for accessibility of services and resources is [[Helsinki Finland]]. The city has developed an accessibility map[[CiteRef::albacete2017re]] that provides information on the accessibility of public spaces, transportation, and services for people with disabilities. The map is based on user-generated data and includes information on the availability of accessible parking, public restrooms, and accessible public transportation. The city also uses HKPIs to evaluate the accessibility of its public transportation system, such as measuring the percentage of public transportation stops that are accessible to people with disabilities and the percentage of vehicles that are equipped with wheelchair ramps.

Pinfold at 05:17, March 31, 2023

2023-03-31T05:17:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:17, March 31, 2023
Line 60:		Line 60:
	One example of a city that has implemented HKPIs for accessibility of services and resources is [[Helsinki Finland]]. The city has developed an accessibility map[[CiteRef::albacete2017re]] that provides information on the accessibility of public spaces, transportation, and services for people with disabilities. The map is based on user-generated data and includes information on the availability of accessible parking, public restrooms, and accessible public transportation. The city also uses HKPIs to evaluate the accessibility of its public transportation system, such as measuring the percentage of public transportation stops that are accessible to people with disabilities and the percentage of vehicles that are equipped with wheelchair ramps.		One example of a city that has implemented HKPIs for accessibility of services and resources is [[Helsinki Finland]]. The city has developed an accessibility map[[CiteRef::albacete2017re]] that provides information on the accessibility of public spaces, transportation, and services for people with disabilities. The map is based on user-generated data and includes information on the availability of accessible parking, public restrooms, and accessible public transportation. The city also uses HKPIs to evaluate the accessibility of its public transportation system, such as measuring the percentage of public transportation stops that are accessible to people with disabilities and the percentage of vehicles that are equipped with wheelchair ramps.

	[[London England]] is another city that has implemented HKPIs for accessibility of services and resources. The city's transport agency, Transport for London, has developed a set of accessibility indicators that are used to evaluate the accessibility of the city's transportation system. These indicators include the availability of accessible parking, the number of accessible public transportation stops, and the number of buses and trains that are equipped with wheelchair ramps. The city also uses HKPIs to evaluate the accessibility of its pedestrian infrastructure, such as measuring the number of pedestrian crossings and the availability of tactile paving for people with visual impairments.		[[London England]] is another city that has implemented HKPIs for accessibility of services and resources. The city's transport agency, Transport for London, has developed a set of accessibility indicators[[CiteRef::2018lo]] that are used to evaluate the accessibility of the city's transportation system. These indicators include the availability of accessible parking, the number of accessible public transportation stops, and the number of buses and trains that are equipped with wheelchair ramps. The city also uses HKPIs to evaluate the accessibility of its pedestrian infrastructure, such as measuring the number of pedestrian crossings and the availability of tactile paving for people with visual impairments.

	[[New York NY]] is also using HKPIs to improve the accessibility of its transportation system. The city's Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) has developed a set of accessibility indicators that are used to evaluate the accessibility of the city's subway and bus systems. These indicators include the availability of elevators and escalators at subway stations, the width of subway car doors, and the height of subway platform edges. The MTA also uses HKPIs to evaluate the accessibility of its bus system, such as measuring the percentage of buses that are equipped with wheelchair ramps and the number of bus stops that are accessible to people with disabilities.		[[New York NY]] is also using HKPIs to improve the accessibility of its transportation system. The city's Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) has developed a set of accessibility indicators that are used to evaluate the accessibility of the city's subway and bus systems. These indicators include the availability of elevators and escalators at subway stations, the width of subway car doors, and the height of subway platform edges. The MTA also uses HKPIs to evaluate the accessibility of its bus system, such as measuring the percentage of buses that are equipped with wheelchair ramps and the number of bus stops that are accessible to people with disabilities.

Pinfold at 05:11, March 31, 2023

2023-03-31T05:11:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:11, March 31, 2023
Line 58:		Line 58:

	==Case studies of cities using HKPIs for accessibility of services and resources==		==Case studies of cities using HKPIs for accessibility of services and resources==
	One example of a city that has implemented HKPIs for accessibility of services and resources is [[Helsinki Finland]]. The city has developed an accessibility map that provides information on the accessibility of public spaces, transportation, and services for people with disabilities. The map is based on user-generated data and includes information on the availability of accessible parking, public restrooms, and accessible public transportation. The city also uses HKPIs to evaluate the accessibility of its public transportation system, such as measuring the percentage of public transportation stops that are accessible to people with disabilities and the percentage of vehicles that are equipped with wheelchair ramps.		One example of a city that has implemented HKPIs for accessibility of services and resources is [[Helsinki Finland]]. The city has developed an accessibility map[[CiteRef::albacete2017re]] that provides information on the accessibility of public spaces, transportation, and services for people with disabilities. The map is based on user-generated data and includes information on the availability of accessible parking, public restrooms, and accessible public transportation. The city also uses HKPIs to evaluate the accessibility of its public transportation system, such as measuring the percentage of public transportation stops that are accessible to people with disabilities and the percentage of vehicles that are equipped with wheelchair ramps.

	[[London England]] is another city that has implemented HKPIs for accessibility of services and resources. The city's transport agency, Transport for London, has developed a set of accessibility indicators that are used to evaluate the accessibility of the city's transportation system. These indicators include the availability of accessible parking, the number of accessible public transportation stops, and the number of buses and trains that are equipped with wheelchair ramps. The city also uses HKPIs to evaluate the accessibility of its pedestrian infrastructure, such as measuring the number of pedestrian crossings and the availability of tactile paving for people with visual impairments.		[[London England]] is another city that has implemented HKPIs for accessibility of services and resources. The city's transport agency, Transport for London, has developed a set of accessibility indicators that are used to evaluate the accessibility of the city's transportation system. These indicators include the availability of accessible parking, the number of accessible public transportation stops, and the number of buses and trains that are equipped with wheelchair ramps. The city also uses HKPIs to evaluate the accessibility of its pedestrian infrastructure, such as measuring the number of pedestrian crossings and the availability of tactile paving for people with visual impairments.