Measurement - Revision history

Pinfold at 05:23, April 18, 2023

2023-04-18T05:23:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:23, April 18, 2023
Line 88:		Line 88:
	\|retrieved-from=https://dx.doi.org/		\|retrieved-from=https://dx.doi.org/
	\|retrieved-on=2023-03-03		\|retrieved-on=2023-03-03
	}}		}}{{#scite:
	{{#scite:
	\|reference=cortright2006		\|reference=cortright2006
	\|type=report		\|type=report
Line 96:		Line 95:
	\|publisher=CEOs for Cities		\|publisher=CEOs for Cities
	\|year=2006		\|year=2006
	}}		}}{{#scite:
	{{#scite:
	\|reference=cortright2012		\|reference=cortright2012
	\|type=report		\|type=report
Line 105:		Line 103:
	\|year=2012		\|year=2012
	\|file=https://opencommons.org/images/8/84/Cortright_CityVitals2_2012.pdf		\|file=https://opencommons.org/images/8/84/Cortright_CityVitals2_2012.pdf
	}}		}}{{#scite:
	{{#scite:
	\|reference=ross2019ka		\|reference=ross2019ka
	\|type=journal-article		\|type=journal-article
Line 121:		Line 118:
	\|retrieved-from=https://dx.doi.org/		\|retrieved-from=https://dx.doi.org/
	\|retrieved-on=2023-03-03		\|retrieved-on=2023-03-03
	}}		}}{{#scite:
	{{#scite:
	\|reference=raworth2017wh		\|reference=raworth2017wh
	\|type=journal-article		\|type=journal-article

Pinfold at 05:22, April 18, 2023

2023-04-18T05:22:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:22, April 18, 2023
Line 76:		Line 76:
	*Confining implementation to technology or infrastructure silos without assessing interoperability and scalability limits the ability to evaluate efficient multi-sector, multi-purpose technologies.		*Confining implementation to technology or infrastructure silos without assessing interoperability and scalability limits the ability to evaluate efficient multi-sector, multi-purpose technologies.
	*Lack of a reliable means for accounting for local conditions limits realistic evaluation of the technology readiness or maturity level of a city or community in comparison to others.		*Lack of a reliable means for accounting for local conditions limits realistic evaluation of the technology readiness or maturity level of a city or community in comparison to others.
	The Holistic KPI (H-KPI) Framework[[CiteRef::wollman2022sm]] builds on conventional KPI methods for a more holistic approach		The Holistic KPI (H-KPI) Framework[[CiteRef::wollman2022sm]] builds on conventional KPI methods for a more holistic approach with integrated KPIs that facilitate self-assessment, strategic planning, and implementation. The Framework provides a measurement means that accounts for unique characteristics such as the differing needs and capabilities of varying districts and neighborhoods; the need to normalize for variations in population and economic scale; and the reuse of previously deployed technologies, including available data sources and types, platforms for data acquisition and distribution, and installed sensors and actuators.
	with integrated KPIs that facilitate self-assessment, strategic planning, and implementation. The
	Framework provides a measurement means that accounts for unique characteristics such as the differing
	needs and capabilities of varying districts and neighborhoods; the need to normalize for variations in
	population and economic scale; and the reuse of previously deployed technologies, including available data
	sources and types, platforms for data acquisition and distribution, and installed sensors and actuators.


	{{#scite:		{{#scite:
	\|reference=wollman2022sm		\|reference=wollman2022sm

Pinfold at 05:20, April 18, 2023

2023-04-18T05:20:07Z

@@ Line 112: / Line 112: @@
   |year=2012
   |file=https://opencommons.org/images/8/84/Cortright_CityVitals2_2012.pdf
 }}

Pinfold at 05:13, April 18, 2023

2023-04-18T05:13:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:13, April 18, 2023
Line 26:		Line 26:
	''"In order to allow analysis of a wide range of ethical decision problems, any version of a coherent individualistic ethical decision theory requires some ideal index indicating the ethical value of each individual’s life. It seems reasonable that this index should be related to wellbeing. In fact the values involved in determining well-being might still form part of an ideal value index, but only after they have been suitably repackaged. But it would appear that a satisfactory ethical value index must transcend any of the commonly accepted notions of wellbeing"''. Peter J. Hammond, Department of Economics, Stanford University		''"In order to allow analysis of a wide range of ethical decision problems, any version of a coherent individualistic ethical decision theory requires some ideal index indicating the ethical value of each individual’s life. It seems reasonable that this index should be related to wellbeing. In fact the values involved in determining well-being might still form part of an ideal value index, but only after they have been suitably repackaged. But it would appear that a satisfactory ethical value index must transcend any of the commonly accepted notions of wellbeing"''. Peter J. Hammond, Department of Economics, Stanford University
	==CEOs for Cities==		==CEOs for Cities==
	The 2006 report titled "City Vitals: New Measures of Success for Cities" by economist Joseph Cortright, in partnership with CEOs for Cities, outlines the key areas that cities need to excel in today, along with a set of metrics to track their progress. The report covers the top 50 metropolitan areas in the U.S., evaluating them based on 20 measures, including Metro Performance (economic indicators) and Core Vitality (strength of the urban core).		The 2006 report titled 'City Vitals: New Measures of Success for Cities'[[CiteRef::cortright2006]] by economist Joseph Cortright, in partnership with CEOs for Cities, outlines the key areas that cities need to excel in today, along with a set of metrics to track their progress. The report covers the top 50 metropolitan areas in the U.S., evaluating them based on 20 measures, including Metro Performance (economic indicators) and Core Vitality (strength of the urban core).

	In 2012, CEOs for Cities published an updated version of the City Vitals research, which expanded its scope to include the 51 largest metro regions in the United States. The updated report provides cities with tools to enhance their competitiveness and vibrancy, using a wide range of metrics, from traditional measures like college attainment to more unique indicators such as the "weirdness index" or Internet search variety.		In 2012, CEOs for Cities published an updated version of the City Vitals[[CiteRef::cortright2012]] research, which expanded its scope to include the 51 largest metro regions in the United States. The updated report provides cities with tools to enhance their competitiveness and vibrancy, using a wide range of metrics, from traditional measures like college attainment to more unique indicators such as the "weirdness index" or Internet search variety.
	==Circular Economy==		==Circular Economy==
	The circular economy[[CiteRef::What is a Circular Economy? 2019]] is an economic model that aims to keep resources in use for as long as possible and to minimize waste and pollution. It is based on the principles of designing out waste and pollution, keeping products and materials in use, and regenerating natural systems. The circular economy is in contrast to the traditional linear economy, which is based on the “take-make-use-dispose” model, where resources are extracted, used to make products, consumed, and then discarded as waste.		The circular economy[[CiteRef::What is a Circular Economy? 2019]] is an economic model that aims to keep resources in use for as long as possible and to minimize waste and pollution. It is based on the principles of designing out waste and pollution, keeping products and materials in use, and regenerating natural systems. The circular economy is in contrast to the traditional linear economy, which is based on the “take-make-use-dispose” model, where resources are extracted, used to make products, consumed, and then discarded as waste.

Pinfold at 05:11, April 18, 2023

2023-04-18T05:11:50Z

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 ''"In order to allow analysis of a wide range of ethical decision problems, any version of a coherent individualistic ethical decision theory requires some ideal index indicating the ethical value of each individual’s life. It seems reasonable that this index should be related to wellbeing. In fact the values involved in determining well-being might still form part of an ideal value index, but only after they have been suitably repackaged. But it would appear that a satisfactory ethical value index must transcend any of the commonly accepted notions of wellbeing"''. Peter J. Hammond, Department of Economics, Stanford University
 ==Circular Economy==
 The circular economy[[CiteRef::What is a Circular Economy? 2019]] is an economic model that aims to keep resources in use for as long as possible and to minimize waste and pollution. It is based on the principles of designing out waste and pollution, keeping products and materials in use, and regenerating natural systems. The circular economy is in contrast to the traditional linear economy, which is based on the “take-make-use-dispose” model, where resources are extracted, used to make products, consumed, and then discarded as waste.
@@ Line 78: / Line 82: @@
 population and economic scale; and the reuse of previously deployed technologies, including available data
 sources and types, platforms for data acquisition and distribution, and installed sensors and actuators.

Pinfold at 19:43, March 3, 2023

2023-03-03T19:43:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:43, March 3, 2023
Line 39:		Line 39:

	==Doughnut Economics==		==Doughnut Economics==
	Doughnut economics is a framework developed by economist Kate Raworth that aims to balance economic, social, and environmental well-being within the boundaries of the planet[[CiteRef::~~Doughnut Economics 2017~~]][[CiteRef::raworth2017wh]]. It is based on the idea that economies should operate within the "doughnut-shaped" space between the "social foundation" and the "ecological ceiling." The social foundation represents the minimum standards of well-being that every person should have access to, such as adequate food, housing, and healthcare. The ecological ceiling represents the maximum level of environmental degradation that the planet can sustain.		Doughnut economics is a framework developed by economist Kate Raworth that aims to balance economic, social, and environmental well-being within the boundaries of the planet[[CiteRef::ross2019ka]][[CiteRef::raworth2017wh]]. It is based on the idea that economies should operate within the "doughnut-shaped" space between the "social foundation" and the "ecological ceiling." The social foundation represents the minimum standards of well-being that every person should have access to, such as adequate food, housing, and healthcare. The ecological ceiling represents the maximum level of environmental degradation that the planet can sustain.

	[[Media:2409-ArticleText-3132-1-10-20200408.pdf\|Doughnut Economics]] addresses the weaknesses of GDP by providing a holistic view of well-being that goes beyond economic growth. It focuses on meeting the needs of all people within the means of the planet, and it takes into account the social and environmental factors that GDP does not.		[[Media:2409-ArticleText-3132-1-10-20200408.pdf\|Doughnut Economics]] addresses the weaknesses of GDP by providing a holistic view of well-being that goes beyond economic growth. It focuses on meeting the needs of all people within the means of the planet, and it takes into account the social and environmental factors that GDP does not.

Pinfold at 19:38, March 3, 2023

2023-03-03T19:38:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:38, March 3, 2023
Line 67:		Line 67:
	The use of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) in cities and communities is a common practice, with wellknown generic indicators for evaluating and measuring today’s smart city ecosystems. However, many		The use of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) in cities and communities is a common practice, with wellknown generic indicators for evaluating and measuring today’s smart city ecosystems. However, many
	conventional KPI approaches are limited by the following.		conventional KPI approaches are limited by the following.
	* A focus on technology-linked or sector/domain-specific outputs limits measurement of broader		* A focus on technology-linked or sector/domain-specific outputs limits measurement of broader indirect benefits essential to accurate assessment of impact and return on investment.
	indirect benefits essential to accurate assessment of impact and return on investment.		*The lack of a reliable means for measuring real return on investment limits the development of mature smart city business models.
	*The lack of a reliable means for measuring real return on investment limits the development of		*The application of generic KPI objectives without accounting for unique community characteristics limits the ability to benefit from others’ experiences and adapt solutions from other settings.
	mature smart city business models.		*Confining implementation to technology or infrastructure silos without assessing interoperability and scalability limits the ability to evaluate efficient multi-sector, multi-purpose technologies.
	*The application of generic KPI objectives without accounting for unique community characteristics		*Lack of a reliable means for accounting for local conditions limits realistic evaluation of the technology readiness or maturity level of a city or community in comparison to others.
	limits the ability to benefit from others’ experiences and adapt solutions from other settings.
	*Confining implementation to technology or infrastructure silos without assessing interoperability
	and scalability limits the ability to evaluate efficient multi-sector, multi-purpose technologies.
	*Lack of a reliable means for accounting for local conditions limits realistic evaluation of the
	technology readiness or maturity level of a city or community in comparison to others.
	The Holistic KPI (H-KPI) Framework[[CiteRef::wollman2022sm]] builds on conventional KPI methods for a more holistic approach		The Holistic KPI (H-KPI) Framework[[CiteRef::wollman2022sm]] builds on conventional KPI methods for a more holistic approach
	with integrated KPIs that facilitate self-assessment, strategic planning, and implementation. The		with integrated KPIs that facilitate self-assessment, strategic planning, and implementation. The

Pinfold at 19:35, March 3, 2023

2023-03-03T19:35:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:35, March 3, 2023
Line 51:		Line 51:

	[[File:Creating-City-Portraits-Methodology.pdf\|200px\|City Portraits]] [[File:C40 Cities and Mayors Migration Council (2021) Cities, Climate and Migration - The role of cities at the climate-migration nexus.pdf\|200px\|Cities, Climate and Mitigation]]		[[File:Creating-City-Portraits-Methodology.pdf\|200px\|City Portraits]] [[File:C40 Cities and Mayors Migration Council (2021) Cities, Climate and Migration - The role of cities at the climate-migration nexus.pdf\|200px\|Cities, Climate and Mitigation]]

			==Holistic Key Performance Indicators==

			Cities and communities worldwide are increasingly turning to advanced technologies to meet their strategic
			economic, environmental, safety, and other goals, with the overall goal of improving the quality of life for
			their occupants. This document presents research findings and scientific work that advance the development
			and progression of smart city and community measurement methodology.

			The term ‘smart,’ as used in the phrase ‘smart cities,’ is defined here as the efficient use of digital
			technologies to provide prioritized services and benefits to meet community goals, such as economic
			vitality, equity, resilience, sustainability, or quality of life. Without reliable measurement methods for
			‘smart,’ there is a gap in the ability to answer questions such as ‘how smart is my smart city plan,’ or ‘how
			can my community strategy be made smarter?’ The purpose of this report is to address this gap.

			The use of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) in cities and communities is a common practice, with wellknown generic indicators for evaluating and measuring today’s smart city ecosystems. However, many
			conventional KPI approaches are limited by the following.
			* A focus on technology-linked or sector/domain-specific outputs limits measurement of broader
			indirect benefits essential to accurate assessment of impact and return on investment.
			*The lack of a reliable means for measuring real return on investment limits the development of
			mature smart city business models.
			*The application of generic KPI objectives without accounting for unique community characteristics
			limits the ability to benefit from others’ experiences and adapt solutions from other settings.
			*Confining implementation to technology or infrastructure silos without assessing interoperability
			and scalability limits the ability to evaluate efficient multi-sector, multi-purpose technologies.
			*Lack of a reliable means for accounting for local conditions limits realistic evaluation of the
			technology readiness or maturity level of a city or community in comparison to others.
			The Holistic KPI (H-KPI) Framework[[CiteRef::wollman2022sm]] builds on conventional KPI methods for a more holistic approach
			with integrated KPIs that facilitate self-assessment, strategic planning, and implementation. The
			Framework provides a measurement means that accounts for unique characteristics such as the differing
			needs and capabilities of varying districts and neighborhoods; the need to normalize for variations in
			population and economic scale; and the reuse of previously deployed technologies, including available data
			sources and types, platforms for data acquisition and distribution, and installed sensors and actuators.

Pinfold at 19:16, March 3, 2023

2023-03-03T19:16:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:16, March 3, 2023
Line 51:		Line 51:

	[[File:Creating-City-Portraits-Methodology.pdf\|200px\|City Portraits]] [[File:C40 Cities and Mayors Migration Council (2021) Cities, Climate and Migration - The role of cities at the climate-migration nexus.pdf\|200px\|Cities, Climate and Mitigation]]		[[File:Creating-City-Portraits-Methodology.pdf\|200px\|City Portraits]] [[File:C40 Cities and Mayors Migration Council (2021) Cities, Climate and Migration - The role of cities at the climate-migration nexus.pdf\|200px\|Cities, Climate and Mitigation]]

	~~{{#scite:~~
	~~\|reference=raworth2017wh~~
	~~\|type=journal-article~~
	~~\|title=Why it's time for Doughnut Economics~~
	~~\|author=Kate Raworth~~
	~~\|journal=IPPR Progressive Review~~
	~~\|publisher=Wiley~~
	~~\|year=2017~~
	~~\|volume=24~~
	~~\|issue=3~~
	~~\|pages=216-222~~
	~~\|doi=10.1111/newe.12058~~
	~~\|subject=Political Science and International Relations;Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous);Sociology and Political Science\|+sep=;~~
	~~\|issn=2573-2323~~
	~~\|retrieved-from=https://dx.doi.org/~~
	~~\|retrieved-on=2023-02-27~~
	~~\|@show=true~~
	}}
	~~{{#scite:~~
	~~\|reference=wollman2022sm~~
	~~\|type=report~~
	~~\|title=Smart Cities and Communities: A Key Performance Indicators Framework~~
	~~\|author=David Wollman~~
	~~\|publisher=National Institute of Standards and Technology~~
	~~\|year=2022~~
	~~\|doi=10.6028/nist.sp.1900-206-upd1~~
	~~\|retrieved-from=https://dx.doi.org/~~
	~~\|retrieved-on=2023-03-03~~
	~~\|@show=true~~
	}}

Pinfold at 18:00, March 3, 2023

2023-03-03T18:00:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:00, March 3, 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Chapter		{{Chapter
	\| ~~blueprint~~ = ~~Wellbeing~~		\|image=WellbeingChapter.png
	\| ~~sectors~~ = ~~Wellbeing~~		\|poc=Stan Curtis
	\| authors = Stan Curtis, Wilfred Pinfold		\|authors=Stan Curtis, Wilfred Pinfold
	\| ~~poc~~ = ~~Stan Curtis~~		\|blueprint=Wellbeing
	\| ~~email~~ = ~~stan.curtis@urban.systems~~		\|sectors=Wellbeing
	~~\| document = Under_Development.pdf~~		\|summary=Wellbeing refers to a state of being happy, healthy, and comfortable in one's life. It encompasses a range of physical, mental, and emotional factors, and can be influenced by a variety of factors such as genetics, environment, and personal choices.
	~~\| chapter = 9000~~		\|email=stan.curtis@urban.systems
	~~\| image = WellbeingChapter.png~~		\|document=Under_Development.pdf
	\| summary = Wellbeing refers to a state of being happy, healthy, and comfortable in one's life. It encompasses a range of physical, mental, and emotional factors, and can be influenced by a variety of factors such as genetics, environment, and personal choices.		\|chapter=9000
	}}		}}
	Physical well-being includes elements such as having enough energy, feeling good in one's body, and being free from illness or injury. Mental well-being includes elements such as having a positive outlook, feeling able to cope with stress, and having a sense of purpose or meaning in life. Emotional well-being includes elements such as feeling content and satisfied, and having supportive and positive relationships.		Physical well-being includes elements such as having enough energy, feeling good in one's body, and being free from illness or injury. Mental well-being includes elements such as having a positive outlook, feeling able to cope with stress, and having a sense of purpose or meaning in life. Emotional well-being includes elements such as feeling content and satisfied, and having supportive and positive relationships.
Line 54:		Line 54:
	{{#scite:		{{#scite:
	\|reference=raworth2017wh		\|reference=raworth2017wh
	\|type=journal		\|type=journal-article
	\|title=Why it's time for Doughnut Economics		\|title=Why it's time for Doughnut Economics
	\|author=Kate Raworth		\|author=Kate Raworth

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:16, March 3, 2023
Line 51:		Line 51:

	[[File:Creating-City-Portraits-Methodology.pdf\|200px\|City Portraits]] [[File:C40 Cities and Mayors Migration Council (2021) Cities, Climate and Migration - The role of cities at the climate-migration nexus.pdf\|200px\|Cities, Climate and Mitigation]]		[[File:Creating-City-Portraits-Methodology.pdf\|200px\|City Portraits]] [[File:C40 Cities and Mayors Migration Council (2021) Cities, Climate and Migration - The role of cities at the climate-migration nexus.pdf\|200px\|Cities, Climate and Mitigation]]

	~~{{#scite:~~
	~~\|reference=raworth2017wh~~
	~~\|type=journal-article~~
	~~\|title=Why it's time for Doughnut Economics~~
	~~\|author=Kate Raworth~~
	~~\|journal=IPPR Progressive Review~~
	~~\|publisher=Wiley~~
	~~\|year=2017~~
	~~\|volume=24~~
	~~\|issue=3~~
	~~\|pages=216-222~~
	~~\|doi=10.1111/newe.12058~~
	~~\|subject=Political Science and International Relations;Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous);Sociology and Political Science\|+sep=;~~
	~~\|issn=2573-2323~~
	~~\|retrieved-from=https://dx.doi.org/~~
	~~\|retrieved-on=2023-02-27~~
	~~\|@show=true~~
	}}
	~~{{#scite:~~
	~~\|reference=wollman2022sm~~
	~~\|type=report~~
	~~\|title=Smart Cities and Communities: A Key Performance Indicators Framework~~
	~~\|author=David Wollman~~
	~~\|publisher=National Institute of Standards and Technology~~
	~~\|year=2022~~
	~~\|doi=10.6028/nist.sp.1900-206-upd1~~
	~~\|retrieved-from=https://dx.doi.org/~~
	~~\|retrieved-on=2023-03-03~~
	~~\|@show=true~~
	}}