Focus Areas - Revision history

Pinfold at 16:55, July 7, 2022

2022-07-07T16:55:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:55, July 7, 2022
Line 20:		Line 20:
	==Key Indicators==		==Key Indicators==
	Blue wedges show social performance relative to a threshold associated with meeting basic needs. Green wedges show resource use relative to a biophysical boundary associated with sustainability. Red wedges show shortfalls below the social threshold or overshoot beyond the biophysical boundary, while grey wedges show indicators with missing data. Wedges with a dashed edge extend beyond the chart area. Ideally a country would have blue wedges that reach the social foundation and green wedges within the ecological ceiling. See the tables below for country-specific details.		Blue wedges show social performance relative to a threshold associated with meeting basic needs. Green wedges show resource use relative to a biophysical boundary associated with sustainability. Red wedges show shortfalls below the social threshold or overshoot beyond the biophysical boundary, while grey wedges show indicators with missing data. Wedges with a dashed edge extend beyond the chart area. Ideally a country would have blue wedges that reach the social foundation and green wedges within the ecological ceiling. See the tables below for country-specific details.
	[[File:DoughnutKeyIndicators.jpg\|link=https://goodlife.leeds.ac.uk/national-snapshots/countries/~~#United%20States~~]]		[[File:DoughnutKeyIndicators.jpg\|link=https://goodlife.leeds.ac.uk/national-snapshots/countries/]]
	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable"
	\|-		\|-

Pinfold at 16:53, July 7, 2022

2022-07-07T16:53:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:53, July 7, 2022
Line 20:		Line 20:
	==Key Indicators==		==Key Indicators==
	Blue wedges show social performance relative to a threshold associated with meeting basic needs. Green wedges show resource use relative to a biophysical boundary associated with sustainability. Red wedges show shortfalls below the social threshold or overshoot beyond the biophysical boundary, while grey wedges show indicators with missing data. Wedges with a dashed edge extend beyond the chart area. Ideally a country would have blue wedges that reach the social foundation and green wedges within the ecological ceiling. See the tables below for country-specific details.		Blue wedges show social performance relative to a threshold associated with meeting basic needs. Green wedges show resource use relative to a biophysical boundary associated with sustainability. Red wedges show shortfalls below the social threshold or overshoot beyond the biophysical boundary, while grey wedges show indicators with missing data. Wedges with a dashed edge extend beyond the chart area. Ideally a country would have blue wedges that reach the social foundation and green wedges within the ecological ceiling. See the tables below for country-specific details.
	[[File:DoughnutKeyIndicators.jpg]]		[[File:DoughnutKeyIndicators.jpg\|link=https://goodlife.leeds.ac.uk/national-snapshots/countries/#United%20States]]
	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable"
	\|-		\|-

Pinfold at 16:43, July 7, 2022

2022-07-07T16:43:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:43, July 7, 2022
Line 17:		Line 17:
	#Safety and community resilience issues		#Safety and community resilience issues
	#Start with key performance indicators of a city		#Start with key performance indicators of a city

			==Key Indicators==
			Blue wedges show social performance relative to a threshold associated with meeting basic needs. Green wedges show resource use relative to a biophysical boundary associated with sustainability. Red wedges show shortfalls below the social threshold or overshoot beyond the biophysical boundary, while grey wedges show indicators with missing data. Wedges with a dashed edge extend beyond the chart area. Ideally a country would have blue wedges that reach the social foundation and green wedges within the ecological ceiling. See the tables below for country-specific details.
			[[File:DoughnutKeyIndicators.jpg]]
			{\| class="wikitable"
			\|-
			!style="text-align:left;"\|Social Indicator
			!United Kingdom
			!Sri Lanka
			!Per Capita Boundary
			!Threshold Unit
			\|-
			\|Life Satisfaction
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|6.9
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|4.2
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|6.5
			\|[0-10] Cantril scale
			\|-
			\|Healthy Life Expect.
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|71
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|64
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|65
			\|years of healthy life
			\|-
			\|Nutrition
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|3414
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|2488
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|2700
			\|kilocalories per capita per day
			\|-
			\|Sanitation
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|100
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|91.1
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|95
			\|% with access to improved sanitation
			\|-
			\|Income
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|100
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|98.3
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|95
			\|% who earn above $1.90 per day
			\|-
			\|Access to Energy
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|100
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|88.7
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|95
			\|% with access to electricity
			\|-
			\|Education
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|92.8
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|99.1
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|95
			\|% enrolment in secondary school
			\|-
			\|Social Support
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|94.9
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|84.2
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|90
			\|% with friends or family they can depend on
			\|-
			\|Democratic Quality
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|0.8
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|-0.6
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|0.8
			\|Democratic Quality Index
			\|-
			\|Equality
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|65.2
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|58.5
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|70
			\|[0-100] Scale -> (1 - Gini Index) * 100
			\|-
			\|Employment
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|92.2
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|95.8
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|94
			\|% of labour force employed
			\|}

			{\| class="wikitable"
			\|-
			!style="text-align:left;"\|Biophysical Indicator
			!United Kingdom
			!Sri Lanka
			!Per Capita Boundary
			!Unit
			\|-
			\|CO2 Emissions
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|12.1
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|1.1
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|1.6
			\|tonnes CO2 per year
			\|-
			\|Phosphorus
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|5.2
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|0.1
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|0.9
			\|kilograms P per year
			\|-
			\|Nitrogen
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|72.9
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|1.9
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|8.9
			\|kilograms N per year
			\|-
			\|Blue Water
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|240
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|405
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|574
			\|cubic metres H2O per year
			\|-
			\|Land Use (eHANPP)
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|2.4
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|1.5
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|2.6
			\|tonnes C per year
			\|-
			\|Ecological Footprint
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|4.2
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|1.2
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|1.7
			\|global hectares (gha) per year
			\|-
			\|Material Footprint
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|24.3
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|3.2
			\|style="text-align:center;"\|7.2
			\|tonnes per year
			\|}

Pinfold: Created page with "==GCTC Organization and Technology Focus Areas== *Transportation systems, vehicles, and autonomy **(adding cross-over topics Parking, Lidar, road systems/ODOT, trenching for..."

2022-07-07T15:27:52Z

Created page with "==GCTC Organization and Technology Focus Areas== *Transportation systems, vehicles, and autonomy **(adding cross-over topics Parking, Lidar, road systems/ODOT, trenching for..."

New page

==GCTC Organization and Technology Focus Areas==
*Transportation systems, vehicles, and autonomy
**(adding cross-over topics Parking, Lidar, road systems/ODOT, trenching for broadband, charging stations, rights of way)
*Data governance and city data platforms and dashboards
*Public utilities for energy, water and waste management
**might this now (or soon) include broadband (perhaps management / oversight / policy)
*Wireless communications and broadband applications (perhaps from the perspective of technologies / data / data management)
*Cybersecurity and privacy for public and private sectors
*Public safety/security and communications
*Community resilience, adaptability and sustainability
*Agriculture and rural productivity and quality of life
*Smart building technologies and IoT applications (perhaps now with “Building” as a verb and including community engagement / Computer-Human Interface Design / UX
*Education and workforce development (Covering the Education industry (vertical) as well as serving as the outreach / education / communications arm for GCTC generally (horizontal) as we have not had a Marketing/Communications *function; Has also been the seat of “Community Engagement” topic)
*Smart Regions and collaboration strategies (Does “collaboration strategies” refer to techniques, technologies, processes, governance?)
*Community well-being, ethics, integrity, and trust (Was “Thriving Communities” coupled with “DEI”)
QUESTIONS: WHAT’S MISSING – WHERE ARE THE GAPS, WHERE ARE THE OTHER OVERLAPS, WHAT ARE THE HANDOFFS BETWEEN FOCUS AREAS, HOW IS OR SHOULD BE THE WORK INTEGRATED
#Safety and community resilience issues
#Start with key performance indicators of a city