City Resilience

Public Safety
Sectors	Public Safety
Contact	Brenda Bannan
Topics	Business Continuity Designing and Implementing a Resilient Smart Public Safety Program Disaster Recovery Emergency Preparedness Emergency Support Functions Floods Law and Order Public Safety and Response Public Safety-Resilience and Regeneration of Communities
Activities Framework for Enhancing Disaster Mitigation and Regeneration of Community Capacity Establishment of a framework that fosters collaborative efforts between diverse public, private, and academic partners to enhance disaster mitigation, community resilience and economic growth. Information for First Responders on Maintaining Operational Capabilities During a Pandemic First responders have a critical role in pre-hospital emergency care and must continue to provide this essential service and fill the many emergency response roles in a community. Next Generation Resilient Warning Systems for Tornados and Flash Floods The project aims to revolutionize severe weather warnings through Next Gen communications and networking. Focusing on hyper-local, user-driven, context-aware alerts, it leverages mobile phones and hyper-local data for customized warnings, enhancing response and outcomes. Regenerative Urbanism Vanport Vanport, Oregon was a temporary housing project built in 1942 to address a wartime housing shortage in Portland. School Organized Locally Assisted Community Emergency‐Management The School Organized Locally Assisted Community Emergency‐Management (SOLACE) project focused on the use of a community school as a community resilience hub for its surrounding community. Community Resilience Hubs (CRHs) can be defined as community‐serving facilities augmented to support residents and coordinate resource distribution of resources and services to the surrounding community. This project focused specifically on the use of a CRM to support community member needs before, during, or after a natural hazard event and on developing a community‐led sociotechnical infrastructure framework for adapting a public school (Buckman Elementary School) as the pilot CRH. In 2022, this project received a NSF Planning Grant.

Authors

{{{summary}}}

The previous section focused on technology development to support whole community planning for disaster recovery, with emphasis on the requirements for multi-agency planning and decision -making involving an entire community and its physical, economic, and social resources.

Technology development strategies to enhance City (or Community) Resilience are closely aligned with capabilities for disaster recovery, insofar as they involve the entire scope of community functions. However, developing a technology strategy for enhancing the resilience of a community or region involves more than focusing on disaster response or recovery (or disaster resistance, as it is sometimes called), or even on the single issue of public safety as traditionally defined. A holistic appro ach to resilience and community sustainability involves the broad spectrum of human activities and interactions within the community as the sum of relationships between four interconnected systems:

1. The natural environment of geography, climate and weather;
2. The built environment of the city habitat, its engineered systems, and physical infrastructure;
3. The social environment of human population, communities and socio-economic activities; and
4. An information ecosystem that provides the means for understanding, interacting with, and managing the relationships between the natural, built, and human environments.

As the nation and its communities become more connected, networked, and technologically sophisticated, new challenges and opportunities arise that demand a rethinking of current approaches to public safety and emergency management. An integrated approach to city and community resilience holds the potential to greatly enhance overall public safety, emergency response, and disaster recovery, while addressing new and emerging threats to public safety and security.

Community resilience-building is effectively an aspect of mitigation planning. Figure 12 illustrates the range and relationships among the hazards that community resilience programs in the public safety arena may need to address.

Figure 12. Examples of Threats and Hazards Facing Communities (DHS National Mitigation Framework)

After nearly a decade of research, planning, policy development, and implementation, there is no shortage of models, frameworks, and guidance documents for developing and establishing a community resilience program. (By way of example, simply conduct an online search for “community resilience frameworks,” or “smart city.”) Widely accepted strategies include Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015 - 2030 or Rockefeller 100 Resilient Cities program.

Resilience as defined by the Sendai Framework is the ability of a system, community, or society exposed to hazards to resist, absorb, accommodate, adapt to, transform and recover from the effects of a hazard in a timely and efficient manner, including through the preservation and restoration of its Essential basic structures and functions through risk management. Increasingly, in the context of cities resilience is framed around the ability to withstand and bounce back from both acute shocks (natural and manmade) such as floods, earthquakes, hurricanes, wild-fires, chemical spills, power outages, as well as chronic stresses occurring over longer time scales, such as groundwater depletion or deforestation, or socio-economic issues such as homelessness and unemployment.

The United Nations Disaster Resilience Scorecard for Cities is a recommended starting point for cities to self-assess their preparedness. This Scorecard is structured around the “Ten Essentials for Making Cities Resilient”, first developed as part of the Hyogo Framework for Action in 2005, and then updated to support implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction: 2015-2030.

Figure 13: The Ten Essentials of Making Cities Resilient from the Sendai Framework